Paper · 1994 · DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))

Development and activity of the symbiosis between Bradyrhizobium strains, Glomus species and Cicer arietinum: effect of timing of inoculation and photon irradiance

Juan Manuel Ruíz-Lozano; Rosario Azcón

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The compatibility of dual inoculation of Glomus species and Bradyrhizobium strains was determined in relation to the time of inoculation and light intensity. The effects of simultaneous or sequential inoculation of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Glomus mosseae or Glomus fasciculatum and two Bradyrhizobium strains (Br 185 or Br 192) on the growth and nutrient uptake by Cicer arietinum were evaluated. Plant development depended on the particular combination of Bradyrhizobium strain and Glomus species. Symbiotic efficiency was also influenced by the relative time of inoculation of the endophytes involved. Prior inoculation with the mycorrhizal fungus was usually the most effective. Colonization by mycorrhizal fungi was negatively affected when fungi were applied to the seedlings after inoculation with Bradyrhizobium. Nodule number, however, was not increased by prior inoculation with bradyrhizobia. A crucial factor determining the lack of successful nodulation by Br 192 in plants colonized by G. fasciculatum ( the most infective AM endophyte) was found to be a low level of photosynthetic activity. Symbiotic efficiency (plant growth and nutrition) also decreased when the photosynthetic capability of the plants was not sufficient to respond to the demand of the endophytes regarding G. fasciculatum, which was not the case with G. mosseae treatments. Reduction of light intensity to 81.3 µE s-1m-2 (PAR), particularly affected plants colonized by G. fasciculatum as determined by the total sugar content of root extracts. Nearly stressed levels showed higher competitive ability of Glomus species than those of Bradyrhizobium strains, the most sensitive microsymbiont to plant colonization under these limited C resources. Glomus species were less affected and extensive AM colonization reduced the spread of nodulation. The fact that G. mosseae can maintain its activity under stressed light conditions is important in relation to the selection of AM endophytes to be used with leguminous plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea development depended on the combination of Bradyrhizobium strain and Glomus species.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium straine0symbiont
Second interactor
Glomus speciesGlomuse0symbiont
Outcome
Plant developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glomus
Glomus · Second interactorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant development depended on the particular combination of Bradyrhizobium strain and Glomus species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative inoculation time influenced chickpea symbiotic efficiency.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
relative time of inoculatione0
Outcome
Symbiotic efficiencye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symbiotic efficiency was also influenced by the relative time of inoculation of the endophytes involved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior fungal inoculation was usually most effective.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Prior inoculation with the mycorrhizal funguse0
Interactor
mycorrhizal funguse0symbiont
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prior inoculation with the mycorrhizal fungus was usually the most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal inoculation after Bradyrhizobium negatively affected mycorrhizal colonization.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
fungi were applied to the seedlings after inoculation with Bradyrhizobiume0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Second interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
Colonization by mycorrhizal fungie0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colonization by mycorrhizal fungi was negatively affected when fungi were applied to the seedlings after inoculation with Bradyrhizobium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior bradyrhizobial inoculation did not increase nodule number.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
prior inoculation with bradyrhizobiae0
Interactor
bradyrhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
Nodule numbere0
Direction
not increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodule number, however, was not increased by prior inoculation with bradyrhizobia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low photosynthetic activity was implicated in failed Br 192 nodulation in plants colonized by G. fasciculatum.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
Br 192e0symbiont
Second interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
lack of successful nodulation by Br 192e0
Qualifier
low level of photosynthetic activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A crucial factor determining the lack of successful nodulation by Br 192 in plants colonized by G. fasciculatum ( the most infective AM endophyte) was found to be a low level of photosynthetic activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insufficient photosynthetic capacity reduced growth and nutrition in G. fasciculatum-colonized plants.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
Symbiotic efficiency (plant growth and nutrition)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
photosynthetic capability of the plants was not sufficiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symbiotic efficiency (plant growth and nutrition) also decreased when the photosynthetic capability of the plants was not sufficient to respond to the demand of the endophytes regarding G. fasciculatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same reduction was not found with G. mosseae treatment.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
not the casee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was not the case with G. mosseae treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced light particularly affected sugar content in G. fasciculatum-colonized roots.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Reduction of light intensity to 81.3 µE s-1m-2 (PAR)e0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
total sugar content of root extractse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of light intensity to 81.3 µE s-1m-2 (PAR), particularly affected plants colonized by G. fasciculatum as determined by the total sugar content of root extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nearly stressed conditions, Glomus species had higher competitive ability than Bradyrhizobium strains.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
Glomus speciesGlomuse0symbiont
Second interactor
Bradyrhizobium strainse0symbiont
Outcome
competitive ability of Glomus speciese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Bradyrhizobium strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glomus
Glomus · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nearly stressed levels showed higher competitive ability of Glomus species than those of Bradyrhizobium strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1651 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extensive mycorrhizal colonization reduced nodulation spread.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
spread of nodulatione0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extensive AM colonization reduced the spread of nodulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1779–1838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. mosseae maintained activity under stressed light conditions.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
G. mosseae can maintain its activitye0
Qualifier
stressed light conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. mosseae can maintain its activity under stressed light conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1853–1921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.