Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fungal inoculation after Bradyrhizobium negatively affected mycorrhizal colonization.

A claim from Development and activity of the symbiosis between Bradyrhizobium strains, Glomus species and Cicer arietinum: effect of timing of inoculation and photon irradiance · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal inoculation after Bradyrhizobium negatively affected mycorrhizal colonization.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
fungi were applied to the seedlings after inoculation with Bradyrhizobiume0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Second interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
Colonization by mycorrhizal fungie0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colonization by mycorrhizal fungi was negatively affected when fungi were applied to the seedlings after inoculation with Bradyrhizobium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–828
t0

“Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108

Title

Development and activity of the symbiosis between Bradyrhizobium strains, Glomus species and Cicer arietinum: effect of timing of inoculation and photon irradiance

Juan Manuel Ruíz-Lozano; Rosario Azcón DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) 1994

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ebd5c2d6d7084ce4c4134350d79204151852b5e151260ab25eb32e678d3162e5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

inoculation · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.