Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Prior inoculation with nonpathogenic Fusarium significantly reduced wilt incidence from race 5.

A claim from Induced Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea by Nonpathogenic Races ofFusarium oxysporumf. sp.cicerisand Nonpathogenic Isolates ofF oxysporum · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior inoculation with nonpathogenic Fusarium significantly reduced wilt incidence from race 5.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Prior inoculation with the inducerse0
Interactor
F. o. f. sp. ciceris race 5e0pathogen
Second interactor
nonpathogenic races 0 and 1 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germinated seeds of chickpea cultivars JG 62 and ICCV 4 were inoculated with a conidial suspension of nonpathogenic races 0 and 1 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris or isolates of F. oxysporum (inducers), then challenged by root dip in a conidial suspension of F. o. f. sp. ciceris race 5. Prior inoculation with the inducers significantly reduced disease incidence and severity caused by race 5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–398

Title

Induced Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea by Nonpathogenic Races ofFusarium oxysporumf. sp.cicerisand Nonpathogenic Isolates ofF oxysporum

A. Hervas Plant Disease 1995. doi:10.1094/pd-79-1110

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-b9f552b2f540f6b0e74e67f9be23950743c6e8c769994f1f05034ee0f35f0823 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.