Paper · 2003 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Etiology, impact and control of rhizoctonia seedling blight and root rot of chickpea on the Canadian prairies

S. F. Hwang; B. D. Gossen; K. F. Chang; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Studies were undertaken to assess the impact of seedling blight and root rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-4 on nodulation and seed yield of chickpea. The effects of pathogen inoculum concentration and seed damage on disease severity were also measured. Chickpea seedlings were grown under controlled-environment conditions in sterilized soil amended with pathogenic isolates of R. solani and in field plot experiments where the inoculum was incorporated with the seed at planting. In greenhouse experiments, emergence and dry matter production declined and root rot severity increased with increasing inoculum concentration. Root rot reduced nodulation where lesions covered more than 25% of the root surface. For chickpea cultivar Sanford this level of infection was sufficient to reduce root mass, but for the cultivar Tyson, more than half of the root was covered with lesions before root mass began to decline. In a comparison of seed treatment fungicides, thiram + carbathiin (Vitaflo 280) and carbathiin + thiabendazole (Crown at 6 mL of product kg -1 seed) significantly increased seedling emergence and seed yield compared to the inoculated control. In an assessment of the effects of seed damage, seedling survival and seed yield were similar for both healthy and mechanically damaged seed. Rhizoctonia solani has the potential to be an important constraint to chickpea production in the prairie region of western Canada. Key words: Rhizoctonia solani, Cicer arietinum, seed treatment, fungicide, seeding date

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing R. solani inoculum reduced emergence and dry matter production.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
increasing inoculum concentratione0
Outcome
emergence and dry matter productione0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emergence and dry matter production declined and root rot severity increased with increasing inoculum concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing R. solani inoculum raised root rot severity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
increasing inoculum concentratione0
Outcome
root rot severitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emergence and dry matter production declined and root rot severity increased with increasing inoculum concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root rot reduced nodulation when lesions covered over 25% of root surface.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
Root rote0pathogen
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
more than 25% of the root surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root rot reduced nodulation where lesions covered more than 25% of the root surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sanford root mass declined above 25% root lesion coverage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Sanforde0
Outcome
root masse0
Direction
reducee0
Qualifier
this level of infectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For chickpea cultivar Sanford this level of infection was sufficient to reduce root mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tyson root mass declined only once lesions covered more than half the root.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Tysone0
Outcome
root masse0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
more than half of the roote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the cultivar Tyson, more than half of the root was covered with lesions before root mass began to decline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiram plus carbathiin increased emergence and seed yield relative to inoculated control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
thiram + carbathiin (Vitaflo 280)e0
Interactor
rhizoctoniaRhizoctoniat1pathogent0
Outcome
seedling emergence and seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiram + carbathiin (Vitaflo 280) and carbathiin + thiabendazole (Crown at 6 mL of product kg -1 seed) significantly increased seedling emergence and seed yield compared to the inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
t1

“rhizoctonia seedling blight and root rot of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbathiin plus thiabendazole increased emergence and seed yield relative to inoculated control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
carbathiin + thiabendazole (Crown at 6 mL of product kg -1 seed)e0
Interactor
rhizoctoniaRhizoctoniat0pathogen
Outcome
seedling emergence and seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiram + carbathiin (Vitaflo 280) and carbathiin + thiabendazole (Crown at 6 mL of product kg -1 seed) significantly increased seedling emergence and seed yield compared to the inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“rhizoctonia seedling blight and root rot of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical seed damage left seedling survival and seed yield similar to healthy seed.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
mechanically damaged seede0
Outcome
seedling survival and seed yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
healthye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seedling survival and seed yield were similar for both healthy and mechanically damaged seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify R. solani as a potential constraint to chickpea production in western Canada.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
important constraint to chickpea productione0
Setting
prairie region of western Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizoctonia solani has the potential to be an important constraint to chickpea production in the prairie region of western Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1432 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 200 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.