Paper · 2018 · Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and biochar improves drought tolerance in chickpea

Abeer Hashem; Ashwani Kumar; Abeer M. Al-Dbass; et al.

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
248
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation and biochar amendment has been reported to improve growth of several crop plants however their role in stress amelioration individually as well as in combination has not been worked out. This experiment was conducted to evaluate the application of AMF and biochar on the performance of chickpea under drought stress. The treatments included the individual as well as combined treatment of AMF and biochar to drought stressed and normal chickpea plants. Plants inoculation improved growth in terms of shoot and root length, leaf area and number of branches which was observed to show a steep decline due to drought stress. Drought declined the AMF colonization potential though biochar amendment ameliorated the negative effects of drought significantly by improving the spore population, number of mycelium, vesicle and arbuscules and the percentage of colonization as well. Increased chlorophyll synthesis in biochar and AMF treated plants was obvious, which lead to significant enhancement in the net photosynthetic efficiency. Drought stress also declined the relative water content (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI), while treatment of biochar and AMF either individually or in combination mitigated the deleterious effects to considerable extent and caused a significant enhancement in RWC and MSI under normal conditions. Amendments with biochar and AMF inoculation increased the nitrogen fixation attributes including the number and weight of nodules, leghemoglobin content and activity of nitrate reductase enzyme leading to greater uptake and assimilation of nitrogen in them when compared to drought stressed plants. Drought stressed chickpea plants exhibited considerable reduction in uptake of nitrogen and phosphorous which was ameliorated by biochar and AMF treatments. It could be suggested that increase in growth and physiological attributes in chickpea due to biochar amendments and AMF inoculation under drought stress were plausibly due to their involvement in nitrogen and phosphorous uptake, chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation improved shoot and root length, leaf area, and branch number.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Plants inoculatione0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungit1symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root length, leaf area and number of branchese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculation improved growth in terms of shoot and root length, leaf area and number of branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced shoot and root length, leaf area, and branch number.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
shoot and root length, leaf area and number of branchese0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot and root length, leaf area and number of branches which was observed to show a steep decline due to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced AMF colonization potential.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Droughte0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
AMF colonization potentiale0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought declined the AMF colonization potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar ameliorated drought effects by improving AMF spore population, mycelium, vesicles and arbuscules.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
biochar amendmente0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungit1symbiont
Outcome
spore population, number of mycelium, vesicle and arbusculese0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar amendment ameliorated the negative effects of drought significantly by improving the spore population, number of mycelium, vesicle and arbuscules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar improved AMF colonization percentage under drought.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
biochar amendmente0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungit1symbiont
Outcome
percentage of colonizatione0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar amendment ameliorated the negative effects of drought significantly by improving the spore population, number of mycelium, vesicle and arbuscules and the percentage of colonization as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and AMF treatment increased chlorophyll synthesis.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
biochar and AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll synthesise0
Direction
Increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased chlorophyll synthesis in biochar and AMF treated plants was obvious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and AMF treatment significantly enhanced net photosynthetic efficiency.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
biochar and AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
net photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased chlorophyll synthesis in biochar and AMF treated plants was obvious, which lead to significant enhancement in the net photosynthetic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced relative water content and membrane stability index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
relative water content (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI)e0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress also declined the relative water content (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and AMF, separately or together, mitigated drought effects on relative water content and membrane stability index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
biochar and AMF either individually or in combinatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
RWC and MSIe0
Direction
enhancemente0
Qualifier
under normal conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment of biochar and AMF either individually or in combination mitigated the deleterious effects to considerable extent and caused a significant enhancement in RWC and MSI under normal conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1380 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and AMF increased nodule number and weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
biochar and AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
number and weight of nodulese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amendments with biochar and AMF inoculation increased the nitrogen fixation attributes including the number and weight of nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and AMF increased leghemoglobin content and nitrate reductase activity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
biochar and AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
leghemoglobin content and activity of nitrate reductase enzymee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amendments with biochar and AMF inoculation increased the nitrogen fixation attributes including the number and weight of nodules, leghemoglobin content and activity of nitrate reductase enzyme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1575 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and AMF increased nitrogen uptake and assimilation relative to drought-stressed plants.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
biochar and AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
uptake and assimilation of nitrogene0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
drought stressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to greater uptake and assimilation of nitrogen in them when compared to drought stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1679 · show in text ↑
e1

“Amendments with biochar and AMF inoculation increased the nitrogen fixation attributes including the number and weight of nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced chickpea uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
uptake of nitrogen and phosphorouse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stressed chickpea plants exhibited considerable reduction in uptake of nitrogen and phosphorous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and AMF ameliorated drought-related reductions in nitrogen and phosphorus uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
biochar and AMF treatmentse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
uptake of nitrogen and phosphorouse0
Direction
amelioratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stressed chickpea plants exhibited considerable reduction in uptake of nitrogen and phosphorous which was ameliorated by biochar and AMF treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1836 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

54 papers: 11 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

biochar · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

drought · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 2 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

8 of 19 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.