Paper · 2015

Influence of AM Fungi, Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices on Chickpea Growth and Root-Rot Disease Caused by Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi under Greenhouse Conditions

Mahboobeh Sohrabi; Hamid Mohammadi; Amir Hossein Mohammadi

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the present study, the effect of two species of AMF, Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices , alone and in combination, was evaluated on the growth criteria, chlorophyll content, and root rot disease caused by Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi , on chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) under greenhouse conditions. Chickpea seeds were sown into pots containing 100 g of AMF inoculum (more than 1,000 propagules g -1 ) and, after four weeks, root of seedlings were inoculated with conidia suspension (10 6 conidia mL -1 ) of F. solani f. sp. pisi . Six weeks after pathogen inoculation, shoot and root dry weight, shoot height, chlorophyll content and mycorrhizal and Fusarium colonization were measured. Results showed that inoculation of G. mosseae was more effective than G. intraradices and dual inoculations ( G. intraradices +G. mosseae ) on the above criteria. Inoculation of F. solani f. sp. pisi without AMF treatments reduced shoot height, shoot and root dry weight, and chlorophyll content significantly compared with the control. In the presence of AMF, root colonization by F. solani f. sp. pisi and disease severity decreased and individual inoculation with G. mosseae was more effective than the other treatments. Inoculation of G. mosseae and G. intraradices caused a significant increase in plant height, shoot and root dry weight, and chlorophyll content of pathogen-inoculated plants compared with inoculated chickpea plants with F. solani f. sp. pisi. Based on the results, application of G. mosseae was found to be the best for reducing the root rot disease and improving plant growth parameters of chickpea, followed by G. intraradices and dual inoculations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae was more effective than Glomus intraradices and dual inoculation for the reported criteria.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
inoculation of G. mosseaee0
Outcome
growth criteria, chlorophyll content, and root rot diseasee2
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
G. intraradices and dual inoculations ( G. intraradices +G. mosseae )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that inoculation of G. mosseae was more effective than G. intraradices and dual inoculations ( G. intraradices +G. mosseae ) on the above criteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–857 · show in text ↑
e1

“on chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–276 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth criteria, chlorophyll content, and root rot disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium without AMF significantly reduced shoot height, shoot and root dry weight, and chlorophyll content.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Inoculation of F. solani f. sp. pisi without AMF treatmentse0
Outcome
shoot height, shoot and root dry weight, and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of F. solani f. sp. pisi without AMF treatments reduced shoot height, shoot and root dry weight, and chlorophyll content significantly compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF reduced Fusarium root colonization and disease severity in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
AMFe0
Outcome
root colonization by F. solani f. sp. pisi and disease severitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the presence of AMF, root colonization by F. solani f. sp. pisi and disease severity decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae alone was more effective than other treatments at reducing Fusarium colonization and disease severity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
individual inoculation with G. mosseaee0
Outcome
root colonization by F. solani f. sp. pisi and disease severitye0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root colonization by F. solani f. sp. pisi and disease severity decreased and individual inoculation with G. mosseae was more effective than the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1218 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae increased growth and chlorophyll traits of Fusarium inoculated chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation of G. mosseaee0
Outcome
plant height, shoot and root dry weight, and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
inoculated chickpea plants with F. solani f. sp. pisie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of G. mosseae and G. intraradices caused a significant increase in plant height, shoot and root dry weight, and chlorophyll content of pathogen-inoculated plants compared with inoculated chickpea plants with F. solani f. sp. pisi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices increased growth and chlorophyll traits of Fusarium inoculated chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
G. intraradicese0
Outcome
plant height, shoot and root dry weight, and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
inoculated chickpea plants with F. solani f. sp. pisie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of G. mosseae and G. intraradices caused a significant increase in plant height, shoot and root dry weight, and chlorophyll content of pathogen-inoculated plants compared with inoculated chickpea plants with F. solani f. sp. pisi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1461 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favored Glomus mosseae for reducing root rot and improving growth, followed by Glomus intraradices and dual inoculation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
application of G. mosseaee0
Outcome
reducing the root rot disease and improving plant growth parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of G. mosseae was found to be the best for reducing the root rot disease and improving plant growth parameters of chickpea, followed by G. intraradices and dual inoculations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1670 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Funneliformis mosseae · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.