Abstract
A pot culture experiment was conducted to see the efficacy of mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus mosseael for the control of soil-borne plant pathogens of chickpea. Dual inoculations with mycorrhiza and test pathogens (R. bataticola, R. solani and F. oxysporum f.sp. ciceni) increased the seed germination, plant height, number of pods, seed weight and biomass production as compared to inoculations with pathogen alone. Mycorrhizal inoculations suppressed the incidence of wilt and root rot disease by 54% and 62%, respectively. Sporocarp number and mycorrhizal colonization was also reduced by the dual inoculation as compared to inoculation with mycorrhiza alone. Inoculation with R. bataticola + R. solani along with G. mosseae resulted in highest reduction (65%) in mycorrhizal colonization. while R. solani with G. f!1osseae resulted in minimum reduction (39°C in mycorhizal colonization. Mycorrhizal inoculation resulted in better colonization of roots with VAM and thereby caused reduction in the uptake of nutrients (N, P, K and Zn) in chickpea plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Dual mycorrhizal and pathogen inoculation increased chickpea germination, height, pods, seed weight and biomass relative to pathogen alone.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Dual inoculations with mycorrhiza and test pathogense0
- Interactor
- R. bataticolae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- seed germination, plant height, number of pods, seed weight and biomass productione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- R. solani and F. oxysporum f.sp. cicenie0
- Comparator
- inoculations with pathogen alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dual inoculations with mycorrhiza and test pathogens (R. bataticola, R. solani and F. oxysporum f.sp. ciceni) increased the seed germination, plant height, number of pods, seed weight and biomass production as compared to inoculations with pathogen alone.”
t0“CHICKPEA”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation suppressed chickpea wilt incidence by 54%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Mycorrhizal inoculationse0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- incidence of wilte0
- Direction
- suppressede0
- Value
- 54%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizal inoculations suppressed the incidence of wilt and root rot disease by 54% and 62%, respectively.”
t0“CHICKPEA”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation suppressed chickpea root rot incidence by 62%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Mycorrhizal inoculationse0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- root rot diseasee0
- Direction
- suppressede0
- Value
- 62%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizal inoculations suppressed the incidence of wilt and root rot disease by 54% and 62%, respectively.”
t0“CHICKPEA”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation reduced sporocarp number and mycorrhizal colonization compared with mycorrhiza alone.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- dual inoculatione0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- Sporocarp number and mycorrhizal colonizatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- inoculation with mycorrhiza alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sporocarp number and mycorrhizal colonization was also reduced by the dual inoculation as compared to inoculation with mycorrhiza alone.”
t0“CHICKPEA”
Claim · model-written summary
R. bataticola and R. solani with G. mosseae produced the largest colonization reduction, 65%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with R. bataticola + R. solani along with G. mosseaee0
- Interactor
- R. bataticolae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee0symbiont - Outcome
- mycorrhizal colonizatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 65%e0
- Qualifier
- R. solanie0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with R. bataticola + R. solani along with G. mosseae resulted in highest reduction (65%) in mycorrhizal colonization.”
t0“CHICKPEA”
Claim · model-written summary
R. solani with G. mosseae gave the minimum reported reduction in colonization.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- R. solani with G. f!1osseaee0
- Interactor
- R. solanie0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. f!1osseaee0symbiont
- Outcome
- mycorhizal colonizatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Qualifier
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“R. solani with G. f!1osseae resulted in minimum reduction (39°C in mycorhizal colonization.”
t0“CHICKPEA”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation reduced N, P, K and Zn uptake in chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- uptake of nutrients (N, P, K and Zn)e0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizal inoculation resulted in better colonization of roots with VAM and thereby caused reduction in the uptake of nutrients (N, P, K and Zn) in chickpea plants.”
The same questions in other papers
Funneliformis mosseae · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
mycorrhiza · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →inoculation · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →mycorrhiza · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.