Paper · 1992 · Experimental Agriculture

Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Phosphorus Uptake of Chickpea Grown in Northern Syria

Edwin Weber; Eckhard George; Douglas P. Beck; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Inoculation with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (VAMF) improved growth of chick-pea ( Cicer arielinum L.) and doubled phosphorus (P) uptake at low and intermediate levels of P fertilization in a pot experiment on sterilized low-P calcareous soil. In field experiments at Tel Hadya, northern Syria, growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield of spring-sown chickpea remained unaffected by inoculation with VAMF or by P fertilization. The mycorrhizal infection of chickpea was high (approximately 75% of root length mycorrhizal at the flowering stage) irrespective of inoculation with VAMF or P fertilization and may ensure efficient P uptake under field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAMF inoculation improved chickpea growth in pots.

Taxon
chick-peaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (VAMF)e0
Interactor
vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (VAMF) improved growth of chick-pea ( Cicer arielinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAMF inoculation doubled chickpea P uptake at low and intermediate P fertilization.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
VAMFe0
Outcome
phosphorus (P) uptakee0
Direction
doublede0
Qualifier
low and intermediate levels of P fertilizatione0
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (VAMF) improved growth of chick-pea ( Cicer arielinum L.) and doubled phosphorus (P) uptake at low and intermediate levels of P fertilization in a pot experiment on sterilized low-P calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–261 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
t1

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield were unaffected by VAMF inoculation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculation with VAMFe0
Interactor
VAMFe0symbiont
Outcome
growth, shoot P concentration and seed yielde0
Direction
remained unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield of spring-sown chickpea remained unaffected by inoculation with VAMF or by P fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield were unaffected by P fertilization.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
P fertilizatione0
Outcome
growth, shoot P concentration and seed yielde0
Direction
remained unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield of spring-sown chickpea remained unaffected by inoculation with VAMF or by P fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal infection was about 75% of chickpea root length at flowering.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Outcome
mycorrhizal infectione0
Value
approximately 75% of root lengthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mycorrhizal infection of chickpea was high (approximately 75% of root length mycorrhizal at the flowering stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–567 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 200 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 326 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.