Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil boron fertilization increased chickpea yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Soil B fertilizatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil B fertilization increased B content of the grain of lentil ( Lens culinaris ), chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ), and wheat by a factor of two to five, while increasing the yield of chickpea only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–965
t0

“A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF MICRONUTRIENT SEED PRIMING AND SOIL FERTILIZATION ON THE MINERAL NUTRITION OF CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117

Title

A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF MICRONUTRIENT SEED PRIMING AND SOIL FERTILIZATION ON THE MINERAL NUTRITION OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum), LENTIL (Lens culinaris), RICE (Oryza sativa) AND WHEAT (Triticum aestivum) IN NEPAL

S. E. JOHNSON; J. G. LAUREN; R. M. WELCH; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2005. doi:10.1017/s0014479705002851

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e54e5e2b2d8c13e2323ce9480584ee7ff623c5cb333b07589b9630dfca990de6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

boron atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

30 papers: 30 positive, 0 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.