Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined boron and molybdenum application outperformed either alone.

A claim from Effects of Boron and Molybdenum on the Yield of Chickpea · 1970

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined boron and molybdenum application outperformed either alone.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of both boron and molybdenume0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
their single applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of both boron and molybdenum were found superior to their single application even though boron played major role in augmenting the yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1017
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56

Title

Effects of Boron and Molybdenum on the Yield of Chickpea

NC Shil; S Noor; MA Hossain Journal of Agriculture & Rural Development 1970. doi:10.3329/jard.v5i1.1452

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-062ff33dc0c38b5fea5ae04e15e1f10fdb8f785c9fbe63c836aa3b839d42d90a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

molybdenum atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

boron atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

30 papers: 30 positive, 0 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.