Paper · 2002 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

EFFECT OF MODES AND LEVELS OF MOLYBDENUM APPLICATION ON GRAIN YIELD PROTEIN CONTENT AND NODULATION OF CHICKPEA GROWN ON LOAMY SAND SOIL

Chandra Deo; M. L. Kothari

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment was laid out during three consecutive years of 1997–98 to 1999–2000 on loamy sand soil (typic ustipsamment) of the state of Rajasthan in India in rabi season to investigate the effect of modes of application and different levels of molybdenum (Mo) on grain yield, protein content and number of nodules per plant of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.; Variety RSG-44). Doses applied were: 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 kg Mo ha−1 as ammonium molybdate for soil application, and 1.75, 3.5 and 5.25 g sodium molybdate kg−1 seed for seed treatment. The six treatments with one control were replicated thrice in a randomized block design. The physico-chemical characteristics of the soil were: pH-8.1, EC 0.11 dsm−1 and OC 0.12%. Available N, P and K were 158, 20 and 216 kg ha−1, respectively. The Mo status of soil was 0.06 ppm. The three years' pooled data revealed that application of Mo either by soil application or through seed treatment, significantly increased the grain yield of chickpea. Soil application of 1.0 kg Mo ha−1 and seed treatment with 3.5 g sodium molybdate kg−1 seed increased the grain yield by 13.13% and 16.76% over the yields (24.4 and 24.5 q ha−1, respectively) at lower doses while it was at par with yields at higher doses of Mo. Protein content of grain, number of nodules per plant of chickpea and available nitrogen in soil also increased with increasing doses of Mo under both the modes of application. Keywords: Soil applicationSeed treatmentMolybdenumProtein contentNodulationChickpea Cicer arietinum ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors are thankful to the Associate Director (Research) and to the Rajasthan Agricultural University for financial assistance and necessary facilities for this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum application by soil or seed treatment significantly increased chickpea grain yield over control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume3
Treatment
application of Mo either by soil application or through seed treatmente3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
significantly increasede3
Comparator
one controle6
Setting
loamy sand soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was laid out during three consecutive years of 1997–98 to 1999–2000 on loamy sand soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of Mo either by soil application or through seed treatment, significantly increased the grain yield of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1001 · show in text ↑
e6

“The six treatments with one control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of 1.0 kg Mo per ha increased chickpea grain yield by 13.13% over lower doses.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Soil application of 1.0 kg Mo ha−1e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
13.13%e2
Comparator
lower dosese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to investigate the effect of modes of application and different levels of molybdenum (Mo) on grain yield, protein content and number of nodules per plant of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–351 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil application of 1.0 kg Mo ha−1 and seed treatment with 3.5 g sodium molybdate kg−1 seed increased the grain yield by 13.13% and 16.76% over the yields (24.4 and 24.5 q ha−1, respectively) at lower doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with 3.5 g sodium molybdate per kg seed increased chickpea grain yield by 16.76% over lower doses.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
seed treatment with 3.5 g sodium molybdate kg−1 seede2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
16.76%e2
Comparator
lower dosese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to investigate the effect of modes of application and different levels of molybdenum (Mo) on grain yield, protein content and number of nodules per plant of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–351 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil application of 1.0 kg Mo ha−1 and seed treatment with 3.5 g sodium molybdate kg−1 seed increased the grain yield by 13.13% and 16.76% over the yields (24.4 and 24.5 q ha−1, respectively) at lower doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of 1.0 kg Mo per ha gave chickpea grain yield at par with higher Mo doses.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Soil application of 1.0 kg Mo ha−1e2
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
at pare4
Comparator
higher doses of Moe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to investigate the effect of modes of application and different levels of molybdenum (Mo) on grain yield, protein content and number of nodules per plant of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–351 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil application of 1.0 kg Mo ha−1 and seed treatment with 3.5 g sodium molybdate kg−1 seed increased the grain yield by 13.13% and 16.76% over the yields (24.4 and 24.5 q ha−1, respectively) at lower doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1209 · show in text ↑
e4

“while it was at par with yields at higher doses of Mo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1263 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content of chickpea grain increased with increasing Mo doses under both modes of application.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume5
Treatment
increasing doses of Moe5
Outcome
Protein content of graine5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Protein content of grain, number of nodules per plant of chickpea and available nitrogen in soil also increased with increasing doses of Mo under both the modes of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1440 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of nodules per chickpea plant increased with increasing Mo doses under both modes of application.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume5
Treatment
increasing doses of Moe5
Outcome
number of nodules per plant of chickpeae5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Protein content of grain, number of nodules per plant of chickpea and available nitrogen in soil also increased with increasing doses of Mo under both the modes of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1440 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available nitrogen in soil increased with increasing Mo doses under both modes of application.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume5
Treatment
increasing doses of Moe5
Outcome
available nitrogen in soile5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Protein content of grain, number of nodules per plant of chickpea and available nitrogen in soil also increased with increasing doses of Mo under both the modes of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1440 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.