Abstract
Studies conducted for two years (2002-04) on evaluation of different sprayers revealed significant reduction in the larval population with high volume and low volume spray application as compared to ultra low volume spray, thus indicating their effectiveness. However, it was found that ultra low volume sprayer, mist blower and Aspee back pack high volume sprayer did not influence the grain yield. Among the different formulations tested, indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 25 g a.i./ha was highly effective as compared to chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./ha irrespective of spray equipment and gave maximum protection to pods which resulted in increased grain yield
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
High volume spraying significantly reduced pod borer larval population relative to ultra low volume spraying.
- Taxon
- Helicoverpa armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerat0 - Treatment
- high volumee0
- Interactor
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0host - Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- ultra low volume spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“significant reduction in the larval population with high volume and low volume spray application as compared to ultra low volume spray”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Low volume spraying significantly reduced pod borer larval population relative to ultra low volume spraying.
- Taxon
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0
- Treatment
- low volume spray applicatione0
- Interactor
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0host
- Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- ultra low volume spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant reduction in the larval population with high volume and low volume spray application as compared to ultra low volume spray”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Ultra low volume spraying did not influence chickpea grain yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- ultra low volume sprayere0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ultra low volume sprayer, mist blower and Aspee back pack high volume sprayer did not influence the grain yield.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Mist blower spraying did not influence chickpea grain yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- mist blowere0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ultra low volume sprayer, mist blower and Aspee back pack high volume sprayer did not influence the grain yield.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Aspee back pack high volume spraying did not influence chickpea grain yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Aspee back pack high volume sprayere0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ultra low volume sprayer, mist blower and Aspee back pack high volume sprayer did not influence the grain yield.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb was highly effective relative to chlorpyriphos regardless of equipment.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 25 g a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- highly effectivee0
- Direction
- highly effectivee0
- Qualifier
- irrespective of spray equipmente0
- Comparator
- chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 25 g a.i./ha was highly effective as compared to chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./ha irrespective of spray equipment”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb gave maximum pod protection.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 25 g a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- protection to podse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 25 g a.i./ha was highly effective as compared to chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./ha irrespective of spray equipment and gave maximum protection to pods which resulted in increased grain yield”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb increased grain yield through pod protection.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 25 g a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 25 g a.i./ha was highly effective as compared to chlorpyriphos 20 EC@ 250 g a.i./ha irrespective of spray equipment and gave maximum protection to pods which resulted in increased grain yield”
t0“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 173 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
173 papers more in this group
See all 177 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.