Abstract
Field experiments on chickpea (cv. BARI Chola-5) were carried out in Calcareous Dark Grey Floodplain Soil under AEZ 11 at Jessore and Non Calcareous Grey Floodplain Soil under AEZ 13 at Rahmatpur during the rabi season of 2001-2002 and 2002-2003. The objective was to find out the optimum dose of boron and molybdenum for yield maximization. Four levels each of boron (0, 1, 2 and 2.5 kg/ha) and molybdenum (0, 1, 1.5 and 2 kg/ha) along with a blanket dose of N20 P25 K35 S20 Zn2 kg/ha & cowdung 5 t/ha were applied in this study. The combination of B2.5 Mo1.5 kg/ha and B2.5 Mo1 kg/ha produced significantly higher yield in both the years of study at Jessore and Rahmatpur, respectively. The said treatments produced the highest mean yields of 2.10 and 1.49 t/ha for Jessore and Rahmatpur, respectively, which was around 53% higher over control (B0 M0). The combined application of both boron and molybdenum were found superior to their single application even though boron played major role in augmenting the yield. However, from the regression analysis, the optimum treatment combination was calculated as B2.34 Mo1.44 kg/ha for Jessore and B2.20 Mo1.29 kg/ha for Rahmatpur. Key words: Boron, molybdenum, chickpea, yield, flood plain soil. DOI = 10.3329/jard.v5i1.1452 J Agric Rural Dev 5(1&2), 17-24, June 2007
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
B2.5 Mo1.5 kg/ha significantly increased chickpea yield at Jessore.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- B2.5 Mo1.5 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Setting
- Jessoree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combination of B2.5 Mo1.5 kg/ha and B2.5 Mo1 kg/ha produced significantly higher yield in both the years of study at Jessore and Rahmatpur, respectively.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
B2.5 Mo1 kg/ha significantly increased chickpea yield at Rahmatpur.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- B2.5 Mo1 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Setting
- Rahmatpure0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combination of B2.5 Mo1.5 kg/ha and B2.5 Mo1 kg/ha produced significantly higher yield in both the years of study at Jessore and Rahmatpur, respectively.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The Jessore treatment yielded a mean 2.10 t/ha, about 53% over control.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- B2.5 Mo1.5 kg/hae1
- Outcome
- mean yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.10e0
- Qualifier
- around 53% highere0
- Comparator
- control (B0 M0)e0
- Setting
- Jessoree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The said treatments produced the highest mean yields of 2.10 and 1.49 t/ha for Jessore and Rahmatpur, respectively, which was around 53% higher over control (B0 M0).”
t0“Chickpea”
e1“B2.5 Mo1.5 kg/ha and B2.5 Mo1 kg/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The Rahmatpur treatment yielded a mean 1.49 t/ha, about 53% over control.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- B2.5 Mo1 kg/hae1
- Outcome
- mean yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.49 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- around 53% highere0
- Comparator
- control (B0 M0)e0
- Setting
- Rahmatpure0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The said treatments produced the highest mean yields of 2.10 and 1.49 t/ha for Jessore and Rahmatpur, respectively, which was around 53% higher over control (B0 M0).”
t0“Chickpea”
e1“B2.5 Mo1.5 kg/ha and B2.5 Mo1 kg/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined boron and molybdenum application outperformed either alone.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- combined application of both boron and molybdenume0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- their single applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combined application of both boron and molybdenum were found superior to their single application even though boron played major role in augmenting the yield.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Regression estimated an optimum B2.34 Mo1.44 kg/ha for Jessore.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- optimum treatment combinatione0
- Value
- B2.34 Mo1.44 kg/hae0
- Setting
- Jessoree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“from the regression analysis, the optimum treatment combination was calculated as B2.34 Mo1.44 kg/ha for Jessore and B2.20 Mo1.29 kg/ha for Rahmatpur.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Regression estimated an optimum B2.20 Mo1.29 kg/ha for Rahmatpur.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- optimum treatment combinatione0
- Value
- B2.20 Mo1.29 kg/hae0
- Setting
- Rahmatpure0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“from the regression analysis, the optimum treatment combination was calculated as B2.34 Mo1.44 kg/ha for Jessore and B2.20 Mo1.29 kg/ha for Rahmatpur.”
t0“Chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
molybdenum atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →boron atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
29 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.