Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Correcting molybdenum deficiency of chickpea in the High Barind Tract of Bangladesh

Chris Johansen; Abu M. Musa; J. V. D. K. Kumar Rao; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A major limitation to chickpea grown on residual soil moisture after the harvest of rice in the High Barind Tract (HBT) of Bangladesh is acidic surface soil. A diagnostic trial conducted in the 2001/02 season showed that Mo was limiting growth and yield of chickpea. Multilocational on‐farm trials in the 2002/03 season established that Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1 improved nodulation and plant growth and resulted in grain‐yield responses of 58%–173%. In addition, we tested an application method suitable for resource‐poor farmers where Mo and Rhizobium were added in the seed‐priming process. Multilocational trials in farmers' fields in 2003/04 confirmed that this was as effective as soil application of Mo, giving yield responses of 37%–90%. In each of 2004/05 and 2005/06 seasons, 50 farmers implemented on‐farm evaluations of adding Mo + Rhizobium in the priming solution in operational scale plots (666 m 2 ) across the HBT. Mean responses of up to 50%, compared to priming in water only, were obtained. These results suggest that the severe N deficiency of chickpea commonly observed in the HBT can be effectively alleviated by applying Mo and Rhizobium inoculum through a simple low‐cost technology within the scope of resource‐poor farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A diagnostic trial found molybdenum limited chickpea growth and yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Compound
Moe0
Outcome
growth and yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mo was limiting growth and yield of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied molybdenum at 500 g ha –1 improved chickpea nodulation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1e0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1 improved nodulation and plant growth and resulted in grain‐yield responses of 58%–173%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied molybdenum improved chickpea growth.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1e0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1 improved nodulation and plant growth and resulted in grain‐yield responses of 58%–173%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied molybdenum produced grain yield responses of 58%–173%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1e0
Outcome
grain‐yield responsese0
Value
58%–173%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1 improved nodulation and plant growth and resulted in grain‐yield responses of 58%–173%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum and Rhizobium seed priming matched soil-applied molybdenum efficacy.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Mo and Rhizobium were added in the seed‐priming processe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
yield responsese1
Direction
as effective ase1
Value
37%–90%e1
Comparator
soil application of Moe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mo and Rhizobium were added in the seed‐priming process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–613 · show in text ↑
e1

“this was as effective as soil application of Mo, giving yield responses of 37%–90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Operational molybdenum plus Rhizobium priming gave mean responses up to 50% versus water priming.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
adding Mo + Rhizobium in the priming solutione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
Mean responsese1
Value
up to 50%e1
Comparator
priming in water onlye1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“adding Mo + Rhizobium in the priming solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–898 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean responses of up to 50%, compared to priming in water only, were obtained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1031 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend molybdenum and Rhizobium priming to alleviate severe chickpea nitrogen deficiency.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
applying Mo and Rhizobium inoculume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
severe N deficiency of chickpeae0
Setting
HBTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the severe N deficiency of chickpea commonly observed in the HBT can be effectively alleviated by applying Mo and Rhizobium inoculum through a simple low‐cost technology within the scope of resource‐poor farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1270 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

molybdenum atom · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.