Abstract
Abstract A major limitation to chickpea grown on residual soil moisture after the harvest of rice in the High Barind Tract (HBT) of Bangladesh is acidic surface soil. A diagnostic trial conducted in the 2001/02 season showed that Mo was limiting growth and yield of chickpea. Multilocational on‐farm trials in the 2002/03 season established that Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1 improved nodulation and plant growth and resulted in grain‐yield responses of 58%–173%. In addition, we tested an application method suitable for resource‐poor farmers where Mo and Rhizobium were added in the seed‐priming process. Multilocational trials in farmers' fields in 2003/04 confirmed that this was as effective as soil application of Mo, giving yield responses of 37%–90%. In each of 2004/05 and 2005/06 seasons, 50 farmers implemented on‐farm evaluations of adding Mo + Rhizobium in the priming solution in operational scale plots (666 m 2 ) across the HBT. Mean responses of up to 50%, compared to priming in water only, were obtained. These results suggest that the severe N deficiency of chickpea commonly observed in the HBT can be effectively alleviated by applying Mo and Rhizobium inoculum through a simple low‐cost technology within the scope of resource‐poor farmers.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
A diagnostic trial found molybdenum limited chickpea growth and yield.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Compound
- Moe0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Mo was limiting growth and yield of chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil-applied molybdenum at 500 g ha –1 improved chickpea nodulation.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1e0
- Outcome
- nodulatione0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1 improved nodulation and plant growth and resulted in grain‐yield responses of 58%–173%”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil-applied molybdenum improved chickpea growth.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1e0
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1 improved nodulation and plant growth and resulted in grain‐yield responses of 58%–173%”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil-applied molybdenum produced grain yield responses of 58%–173%.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1e0
- Outcome
- grain‐yield responsese0
- Value
- 58%–173%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Mo applied to the soil at 500 g ha –1 improved nodulation and plant growth and resulted in grain‐yield responses of 58%–173%”
Claim · model-written summary
Molybdenum and Rhizobium seed priming matched soil-applied molybdenum efficacy.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Mo and Rhizobium were added in the seed‐priming processe0
- Outcome
- yield responsese1
- Direction
- as effective ase1
- Value
- 37%–90%e1
- Comparator
- soil application of Moe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“Mo and Rhizobium were added in the seed‐priming process”
e1“this was as effective as soil application of Mo, giving yield responses of 37%–90%”
Claim · model-written summary
Operational molybdenum plus Rhizobium priming gave mean responses up to 50% versus water priming.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- adding Mo + Rhizobium in the priming solutione0
- Outcome
- Mean responsese1
- Value
- up to 50%e1
- Comparator
- priming in water onlye1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e0“adding Mo + Rhizobium in the priming solution”
e1“Mean responses of up to 50%, compared to priming in water only, were obtained.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend molybdenum and Rhizobium priming to alleviate severe chickpea nitrogen deficiency.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- applying Mo and Rhizobium inoculume0
- Outcome
- severe N deficiency of chickpeae0
- Setting
- HBTe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the severe N deficiency of chickpea commonly observed in the HBT can be effectively alleviated by applying Mo and Rhizobium inoculum through a simple low‐cost technology within the scope of resource‐poor farmers”
The same questions in other papers
molybdenum atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →molybdenum atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →molybdenum atom · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.