Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Molybdenum and Rhizobium seed priming matched soil-applied molybdenum efficacy.

A claim from Correcting molybdenum deficiency of chickpea in the High Barind Tract of Bangladesh · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum and Rhizobium seed priming matched soil-applied molybdenum efficacy.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Mo and Rhizobium were added in the seed‐priming processe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
yield responsese1
Direction
as effective ase1
Value
37%–90%e1
Comparator
soil application of Moe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44
e0

“Mo and Rhizobium were added in the seed‐priming process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–613
e1

“this was as effective as soil application of Mo, giving yield responses of 37%–90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–765

Title

Correcting molybdenum deficiency of chickpea in the High Barind Tract of Bangladesh

Chris Johansen; Abu M. Musa; J. V. D. K. Kumar Rao; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2007. doi:10.1002/jpln.200700249

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ea0ee9feea7c32f3293ced99d300a1ea7516df6f6ca14466e004f84bc8392dd3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

molybdenum atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Chickpea plants fertilized with Zn, B and Mo had greater total dry matter production at maturity.

    Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield to zinc, boron and molybdenum application under pot conditions · 2010

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Molybdenum increased total dry matter production.

    Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) response to zinc, boron and molybdenum application under field conditions · 2011

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    Basal boron plus molybdenum seed treatment gave the highest grain yield, 1740 kg ha−1.

    Impact of Weather Parameters and Application Methods of Micronutrients on Dry Matter Production and Yield of Chickpea Under the Riverine Area of Bihar Region of India · 2024 · compared with boron basal + molybdenum foliar application

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. negative
    Mo stress decreased seed yield by number and weight.

    Molybdenum Stress-Induced Changes in Growth and Yield of Chickpea · 2004

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Seed and straw yields under 1.5 kg/ha Mo were at par with those under 5 t/ha FYM plus 1.5 kg/ha Mo.

    Effect of FYM, Molybdenum and Weed Management Practices on Weeds, Yield Attributes and Yield of Chickpea · 2006 · compared with 5 tlha FYM +1.5 kgha Me

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Combined boron and molybdenum application outperformed either alone.

    Effects of Boron and Molybdenum on the Yield of Chickpea · 1970 · compared with their single application

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Molybdenum application by soil or seed treatment significantly increased chickpea grain yield over control.

    EFFECT OF MODES AND LEVELS OF MOLYBDENUM APPLICATION ON GRAIN YIELD PROTEIN CONTENT AND NODULATION OF CHICKPEA GROWN ON LOAMY SAND SOIL · 2002 · compared with one control

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Molybdenum raised grain yield by 42.9% over recommended fertilizer.

    Response of chickpea to micronutrients and biofertilizers in vertisol · 2012 · compared with recommended dose of fertilizeralone

    Same direction

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation had no effect on chickpea yield.

    Growth and yield of two chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Canterbury, New Zealand · 1995

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly change crop biomass, grain yield or harvest index of chickpea compared with the non-inoculated control.

    Growth and yield response of chickpea to Rhizobium inoculation: productivity in relation to interception of radiation · 2015 · compared with non-inoculated control

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Rhizobium and 10 ppm GA3 treatments gave an almost negative response in yield parameters, with a few exceptions.

    Growth, yield and biochemical responses of BARI chhola-9 (Cicer arietinum L.) to GA3 and rhizobium application · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Single, dual, and triple bacterial inoculations significantly increased pod number versus control in controlled and field trials.

    Influence of Nitrogen Fixing and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria on the Nodulation, Plant Growth, and Yield of Chickpea · 2007 · compared with control treatment

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Combined Rhizobium and GA3 at 10−5 M enhanced chickpea grain yield by up to 39%.

    The Combined Effects of Gibberellic Acid and Rhizobium on Growth, Yield and Nutritional Status in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2021

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Rhizobium + PSB inoculation enhanced yield attributes, grain and straw yields in chickpea

    Effect ofRhizobiumand Phosphate Solubilizing Bacterial Inoculants on Symbiotic Traits, Nodule Leghemoglobin, and Yield of Chickpea Genotypes · 2013

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Inoculation increased pod number by 28% over control.

    Effect of chickpea in association with Rhizobium to crop productivity and soil fertility · 2016 · compared with control plant

    Same direction

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    First-season priming caused complete chickpea yield loss at both sites.

    A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF MICRONUTRIENT SEED PRIMING AND SOIL FERTILIZATION ON THE MINERAL NUTRITION OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum), LENTIL (Lens culinaris), RICE (Oryza sativa) AND WHEAT (Triticum aestivum) IN NEPAL · 2005

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Seed priming raised mean chickpea yield 47% in 1998–99 trials.

    SHORT DURATION CHICKPEA TO REPLACE FALLOW AFTER AMAN RICE: THE ROLE OF ON-FARM SEED PRIMING IN THE HIGH BARIND TRACT OF BANGLADESH · 2001

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. positive
    Basal boron plus molybdenum seed treatment gave the highest grain yield, 1740 kg ha−1.

    Impact of Weather Parameters and Application Methods of Micronutrients on Dry Matter Production and Yield of Chickpea Under the Riverine Area of Bihar Region of India · 2024 · compared with boron basal + molybdenum foliar application

    Same directionCites this paper

  5. no effect
    Hydropriming treatments did not differ significantly for number of seed per pod, number of empty pod, seed thousand weight in chickpea.

    Effect of different hydropriming times on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2011 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Adding molybdenum alone to priming water did not significantly improve chickpea yield over the control.

    Molybdenum response of chickpea in the High Barind Tract (HBT) of Bangladesh and in Eastern India. · 2005 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Seed-dressing fungicides did not significantly increase grain yield in the infected plot or in farmers’ fields.

    Sources of resistance to Fusarium wilt of chickpea in Sudan · 2002

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Neither seed dressing significantly increased grain yield.

    Sources of resistance to Fusarium wilt of chickpea in Sudan · 2002

    Opposite direction

81 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.