Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculation increased pod number by 28% over control.

A claim from Effect of chickpea in association with Rhizobium to crop productivity and soil fertility · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased pod number by 28% over control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
inoculated with selected Rhizobium bacterial strainse1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
pod numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28%e0
Comparator
control plante0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation significantly increased the pod number by 28% and yield up to 55% as compared to control plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1117
e1

“Local chickpea genotype Uzbekistan-32 was inoculated with selected Rhizobium bacterial strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–664

Title

Effect of chickpea in association with Rhizobium to crop productivity and soil fertility

Botir Khaitov; Akhmad Kurbonov; Anvar Abdiev; et al. EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE (EJSS) 2016. doi:10.18393/ejss.2016.2.105-112

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-17cb3911c8c2ecb20d3f93dbe14209737879647212584a70484865f31f326686 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

208 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.