Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium plus PSB plus PGPR significantly improved chickpea agrophysiological performance, yield attributes and seed yield compared with Rhizobium plus PGPR.

A claim from Effect of fertility levels and biofertilizers on agrophysiological performance, productivity and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium plus PSB plus PGPR significantly improved chickpea agrophysiological performance, yield attributes and seed yield compared with Rhizobium plus PGPR.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Rhizobium + PSB + PGPRe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
agrophysiological performance, yield attributes, seed yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
PGPRe0
Comparator
Rhizobium + PGPRe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR had significantly improved agrophysiological performance, yield attributes, seed yield and protein yield as compared to Rhizobium + PGPR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1090
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134

Title

Effect of fertility levels and biofertilizers on agrophysiological performance, productivity and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

GAURAV VERMA; DEEN DAYAL YADAV; V K SHARMA; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2019. doi:10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93494

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e06643f9c1ff27eefa2d460421ab3b549882d92c49b3e347bfc9b35b16fc19c4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Inoculation increased pod number by 28% over control.

    Effect of chickpea in association with Rhizobium to crop productivity and soil fertility · 2016 · compared with control plant

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    The same treatment significantly enhanced chickpea fertilizer use efficiency and productivity relative to control.

    Biofertilizer and Inorganic Fertilizers Effect on Favorable Characters for Productivity of Chickpea in Bundelkhand of Madhya Pradesh · 2023 · compared with control plot

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation had no effect on chickpea yield.

    Growth and yield of two chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Canterbury, New Zealand · 1995

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly change crop biomass, grain yield or harvest index of chickpea compared with the non-inoculated control.

    Growth and yield response of chickpea to Rhizobium inoculation: productivity in relation to interception of radiation · 2015 · compared with non-inoculated control

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Rhizobium and 10 ppm GA3 treatments gave an almost negative response in yield parameters, with a few exceptions.

    Growth, yield and biochemical responses of BARI chhola-9 (Cicer arietinum L.) to GA3 and rhizobium application · 2018

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Single, dual, and triple bacterial inoculations significantly increased pod number versus control in controlled and field trials.

    Influence of Nitrogen Fixing and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria on the Nodulation, Plant Growth, and Yield of Chickpea · 2007 · compared with control treatment

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Combined Rhizobium and GA3 at 10−5 M enhanced chickpea grain yield by up to 39%.

    The Combined Effects of Gibberellic Acid and Rhizobium on Growth, Yield and Nutritional Status in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2021

    Same direction

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Inoculation increased pod number by 28% over control.

    Effect of chickpea in association with Rhizobium to crop productivity and soil fertility · 2016 · compared with control plant

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    VAM inoculation maximized stover NPK uptake, reported as 42.1, 5.20 and 79.3 kg/ha.

    Effect of biofertilizers and phosphorus levels on economic performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) · 2021 · compared with control plot

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Increasing R. solani inoculum reduced emergence and dry matter production.

    Etiology, impact and control of rhizoctonia seedling blight and root rot of chickpea on the Canadian prairies · 2003

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Chickpea Avrodhi grown in plots inoculated with F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and R. solani had a 22%-25% decrease in yield.

    Field performance of Trichoderma species against wilt disease complex of chickpea caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and Rhizoctonia solani · 2014

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    S. rolfsii inoculation alone gave the lowest chickpea grain yield.

    Effect of soil amendment with Chenopodium album dry biomass and two Trichoderma species on growth of chickpea var. Noor 2009 in Sclerotium rolfsii contaminated soil · 2020 · compared with without any soil amendment

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation had no effect on chickpea yield.

    Growth and yield of two chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Canterbury, New Zealand · 1995

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    M. incognita inoculation decreased chickpea yield by 24%.

    Laboratory and field performance of some soil bacteria used as seed treatments on Meloidogyne incognita in chickpea · 2012

    Opposite direction

208 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.