Paper · 2021 · Agriciltural microbiology

MESORHIZOBIUM CICERІ ND-64 STRAIN — EFFECTIVE MICROSYMBIONT OF MODERN CHICKPEA VARIETIES

О. V. Lohosha; Yu. O. Vorobei; I. V. Volkova; et al.

14
claims
39
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Objective. Study the competitiveness, complementarity and symbiotic activity of a new strain of chickpea nodule bacteria Mesorhizobium ciceri ND-64, study the influence of seed inoculation on the productivity and yield of chickpea varieties of Ukrainian selection under their cultivation in different soil and climatic zones of Ukraine. Methods. Serological, gas chromatography, field experiment and statistical. Results. The use of a new strain of M. ciceri ND-64 for pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Admiral, Odysei, Budzhak, Triumf and Pamiat upon growing in field experiments in the Steppe zone against the background of the local population of nodule bacteria contributes to a significant increase in nitrogen-fixing nodules by 5 % to 67 %, an increase in the mass of nodules by 10 % to 67 % and nitrogenase activity 26 % to 150 % compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12). The use of M. ciceri ND- 64 for pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds under cultivation in the Steppe zone of Ukraine also had a positive effect on increasing the yield of chickpea — by 4 % to 18 % compared to the positive control. Inoculation with a new strain of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Triumf and Pamiat contributed to the formation of higher number of nodules (by 57 % to 89 %), increaseed mass of nodules (2.2–2.9 times) and their nitrogenase activity (2–4 times) compared with the positive control upon cultivation in the Polissia zone on the fields where there is no population of chickpea rhizobia. Under these conditions, an increase in structural parameters of yield, the highest gain in chickpea yield, increase in photosynthetic activity and protein content in grain upon inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 was shown. Obtaining a specific antisera by immunization of rabbits allowed to detect serological relatedness of M. ciceri ND-64, M. ciceri H-101, Mesorhizobium sp. ND-601 and M. ciceri ND-64, isolated from chickpea nodules of Skarb and Pamiat varieties. The competitiveness of M. ciceri ND-64 was determined using the immunological method in the field experiment. It was found that 100 % of nodules have been formed by the representatives of M. ciceri ND-64 in the variant where this serological group was applied for inoculation in the variant with inoculation of the strain M. ciceri ND-64 100 % of the nodules were formed by representatives of this serogroup. Conclusion. M. ciceri ND-64 strain is an effective microsymbiont of chickpea plants, due to its virulence, competitiveness, nitrogen-fixing properties. According to the results of field experiments, it was shown that the new strain, complementary to all studied varieties differing in seed size and shape, type of bush and average height, forms an effective symbiosis for growing chickpea plants both against the active local population of rhizobia and upon the absence of M. cicerі population in the soil. Symbiotic parameters upon seed treatment with suspension of M. ciceri ND-64 exceed these values in the variants with inoculation using the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12 and strains isolated from the nodules of each study variety. Therefore, M. ciceri ND-64 can be used as a bioagent of a microbial preparation for inoculation of chickpea of different varieties in order to form an effective bean-rhizobial symbiosis, increase the productivity of this culture and improve seed quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 increased nitrogen-fixing nodules by 5% to 67% relative to the positive control in Steppe field trials.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Skarb, Admiral, Odysei, Budzhak, Triumf and Pamiate0
Treatment
pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seedse0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie4symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen-fixing nodulese1
Direction
increasee1
Value
5 % to 67 %e1
Comparator
positive controle2
Setting
Steppe zonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Admiral, Odysei, Budzhak, Triumf and Pamiat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–575 · show in text ↑
e1

“contributes to a significant increase in nitrogen-fixing nodules by 5 % to 67 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–774 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–958 · show in text ↑
e3

“upon growing in field experiments in the Steppe zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–628 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of a new strain of M. ciceri ND-64”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 increased nodule mass by 10% to 67% relative to the positive control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seedse0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie4symbiont
Outcome
mass of nodulese3
Direction
increasee3
Value
10 % to 67 %e3
Comparator
positive controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Admiral, Odysei, Budzhak, Triumf and Pamiat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–575 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–958 · show in text ↑
e3

“an increase in the mass of nodules by 10 % to 67 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–826 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of a new strain of M. ciceri ND-64”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 increased nitrogenase activity by 26% to 150% relative to the positive control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seedse0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie5symbiont
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye4
Direction
increasee1
Value
26 % to 150 %e4
Comparator
positive controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Admiral, Odysei, Budzhak, Triumf and Pamiat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–575 · show in text ↑
e1

“contributes to a significant increase in nitrogen-fixing nodules by 5 % to 67 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–774 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–958 · show in text ↑
e4

“nitrogenase activity 26 % to 150 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–865 · show in text ↑
e5

“The use of a new strain of M. ciceri ND-64”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 increased chickpea yield by 4% to 18% relative to the positive control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seedse0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie3symbiont
Outcome
yield of chickpeae2
Direction
increasinge2
Value
4 % to 18 %e5
Comparator
positive controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Admiral, Odysei, Budzhak, Triumf and Pamiat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–575 · show in text ↑
e5

“by 4 % to 18 % compared to the positive control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1195 · show in text ↑
e2

“positive effect on increasing the yield of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1145 · show in text ↑
e3

“The use of a new strain of M. ciceri ND-64”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the Polissia zone, inoculation with the new strain gave 57% to 89% more nodules than the positive control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume6
Material
Skarb, Triumf and Pamiate6
Treatment
Inoculation with a new straine6
Outcome
number of nodulese6
Direction
highere6
Value
57 % to 89 %e6
Comparator
positive controle2
Setting
Polissia zonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–958 · show in text ↑
e6

“Inoculation with a new strain of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Triumf and Pamiat contributed to the formation of higher number of nodules (by 57 % to 89 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1357 · show in text ↑
e3

“cultivation in the Polissia zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the Polissia zone, inoculation with the new strain gave nitrogenase activity 2 to 4 times that of the positive control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume6
Treatment
Inoculation with a new straine6
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye4
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
2–4 timese4
Comparator
positive controle2
Setting
Polissia zonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–958 · show in text ↑
e6

“Inoculation with a new strain of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Triumf and Pamiat contributed to the formation of higher number of nodules (by 57 % to 89 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1357 · show in text ↑
e4

“their nitrogenase activity (2–4 times)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1444 · show in text ↑
e3

“cultivation in the Polissia zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the Polissia zone, inoculation with the new strain gave nodule mass 2.2 to 2.9 times that of the positive control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume6
Treatment
Inoculation with a new straine6
Outcome
mass of nodulese4
Direction
increaseede4
Value
2.2–2.9 timese4
Comparator
positive controle2
Setting
Polissia zonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–958 · show in text ↑
e6

“Inoculation with a new strain of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Triumf and Pamiat contributed to the formation of higher number of nodules (by 57 % to 89 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1357 · show in text ↑
e4

“increaseed mass of nodules (2.2–2.9 times)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1401 · show in text ↑
e3

“cultivation in the Polissia zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 increased structural parameters of chickpea yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64e0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
structural parameters of yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in structural parameters of yield, the highest gain in chickpea yield, increase in photosynthetic activity and protein content in grain upon inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 was shown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 increased photosynthetic activity and grain protein content.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64e0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
protein content in graine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in structural parameters of yield, the highest gain in chickpea yield, increase in photosynthetic activity and protein content in grain upon inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 was shown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 gave the highest gain in chickpea yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64e0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
gain in chickpea yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in structural parameters of yield, the highest gain in chickpea yield, increase in photosynthetic activity and protein content in grain upon inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 was shown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. ciceri ND-64 formed 100% of the nodules in the variant where it was applied.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
nodulese0
Value
100 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 % of nodules have been formed by the representatives of M. ciceri ND-64”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2176–2251 · show in text ↑
e1

“M. ciceri ND-64 strain is an effective microsymbiont of chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2469–2540 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An immunological method detected serological relatedness among M. ciceri ND-64 and related strains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
serological relatednesse0
Comparator
M. ciceri H-101, Mesorhizobium sp. ND-601e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Obtaining a specific antisera by immunization of rabbits allowed to detect serological relatedness of M. ciceri ND-64, M. ciceri H-101, Mesorhizobium sp. ND-601”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–1964 · show in text ↑
e1

“M. ciceri ND-64 strain is an effective microsymbiont of chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2469–2540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with M. ciceri ND-64 gave symbiotic parameters exceeding those of the reference strain M. ciceri H-12.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
suspension of M. ciceri ND-64e0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
Symbiotic parameterse0
Direction
exceede0
Comparator
reference strain of M. ciceri H-12e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symbiotic parameters upon seed treatment with suspension of M. ciceri ND-64 exceed these values in the variants with inoculation using the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2964–3137 · show in text ↑
e1

“M. ciceri ND-64 strain is an effective microsymbiont of chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2469–2540 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend using M. ciceri ND-64 as a bioagent in a microbial preparation for chickpea inoculation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
used as a bioagent of a microbial preparatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. ciceri ND-64 can be used as a bioagent of a microbial preparation for inoculation of chickpea of different varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3210–3329 · show in text ↑

Mesorhizobium ciceri · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Mesorhizobium ciceri · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.