Paper · 2021 · Agriciltural microbiology

MESORHIZOBIUM CICERІ ND-64 STRAIN — EFFECTIVE MICROSYMBIONT OF MODERN CHICKPEA VARIETIES

V. P. Sydorenko; V. V. Volkohon; S. B. Dimova; et al.

16
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Objective. Study the competitiveness, complementarity and symbiotic activity of a new strain of chickpea nodule bacteria Mesorhizobium ciceri ND-64, study the influence of seed inoculation on the productivity and yield of chickpea varieties of Ukrainian selection under their cultivation in different soil and climatic zones of Ukraine. Methods. Serological, gas chromatography, field experiment and statistical. Results. The use of a new strain of M. ciceri ND-64 for pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Admiral, Odysei, Budzhak, Triumf and Pamiat upon growing in field experiments in the Steppe zone against the background of the local population of nodule bacteria contributes to a significant increase in nitrogen-fixing nodules by 5 % to 67 %, an increase in the mass of nodules by 10 % to 67 % and nitrogenase activity 26 % to 150 % compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12). The use of M. ciceri ND- 64 for pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds under cultivation in the Steppe zone of Ukraine also had a positive effect on increasing the yield of chickpea — by 4 % to 18 % compared to the positive control. Inoculation with a new strain of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Triumf and Pamiat contributed to the formation of higher number of nodules (by 57 % to 89 %), increaseed mass of nodules (2.2–2.9 times) and their nitrogenase activity (2–4 times) compared with the positive control upon cultivation in the Polissia zone on the fields where there is no population of chickpea rhizobia. Under these conditions, an increase in structural parameters of yield, the highest gain in chickpea yield, increase in photosynthetic activity and protein content in grain upon inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 was shown. Obtaining a specific antisera by immunization of rabbits allowed to detect serological relatedness of M. ciceri ND-64, M. ciceri H-101, Mesorhizobium sp. ND-601 and M. ciceri ND-64, isolated from chickpea nodules of Skarb and Pamiat varieties. The competitiveness of M. ciceri ND-64 was determined using the immunological method in the field experiment. It was found that 100 % of nodules have been formed by the representatives of M. ciceri ND-64 in the variant where this serological group was applied for inoculation in the variant with inoculation of the strain M. ciceri ND-64 100 % of the nodules were formed by representatives of this serogroup. Conclusion. M. ciceri ND-64 strain is an effective microsymbiont of chickpea plants, due to its virulence, competitiveness, nitrogen-fixing properties. According to the results of field experiments, it was shown that the new strain, complementary to all studied varieties differing in seed size and shape, type of bush and average height, forms an effective symbiosis for growing chickpea plants both against the active local population of rhizobia and upon the absence of M. cicerі population in the soil. Symbiotic parameters upon seed treatment with suspension of M. ciceri ND-64 exceed these values in the variants with inoculation using the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12 and strains isolated from the nodules of each study variety. Therefore, M. ciceri ND-64 can be used as a bioagent of a microbial preparation for inoculation of chickpea of different varieties in order to form an effective bean-rhizobial symbiosis, increase the productivity of this culture and improve seed quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased nitrogen-fixing nodules by 5 % to 67 % versus the reference strain in the Steppe.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
pre-sowing bacterizatione0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen-fixing nodulese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5 % to 67 %e0
Comparator
inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12e0
Setting
Steppe zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of a new strain of M. ciceri ND-64 for pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Admiral, Odysei, Budzhak, Triumf and Pamiat upon growing in field experiments in the Steppe zone against the background of the local population of nodule bacteria contributes to a significant increase in nitrogen-fixing nodules by 5 % to 67 %, an increase in the mass of nodules by 10 % to 67 % and nitrogenase activity 26 % to 150 % compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased mass of nodules by 10 % to 67 % versus the reference strain in the Steppe.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
pre-sowing bacterizatione0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
mass of nodulese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10 % to 67 %e0
Comparator
inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12e0
Setting
Steppe zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of a new strain of M. ciceri ND-64 for pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Admiral, Odysei, Budzhak, Triumf and Pamiat upon growing in field experiments in the Steppe zone against the background of the local population of nodule bacteria contributes to a significant increase in nitrogen-fixing nodules by 5 % to 67 %, an increase in the mass of nodules by 10 % to 67 % and nitrogenase activity 26 % to 150 % compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased nitrogenase activity by 26 % to 150 % versus the reference strain in the Steppe.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
pre-sowing bacterizatione0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
26 % to 150 %e0
Comparator
inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12e0
Setting
Steppe zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of a new strain of M. ciceri ND-64 for pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Admiral, Odysei, Budzhak, Triumf and Pamiat upon growing in field experiments in the Steppe zone against the background of the local population of nodule bacteria contributes to a significant increase in nitrogen-fixing nodules by 5 % to 67 %, an increase in the mass of nodules by 10 % to 67 % and nitrogenase activity 26 % to 150 % compared with the positive control (inoculation with the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased chickpea yield by 4% to 18% versus the reference strain in the Steppe.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
pre-sowing bacterizatione0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND- 64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
yield of chickpeae0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
4 % to 18 %e0
Comparator
positive controle0
Setting
Steppe zone of Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of M. ciceri ND- 64 for pre-sowing bacterization of chickpea seeds under cultivation in the Steppe zone of Ukraine also had a positive effect on increasing the yield of chickpea — by 4 % to 18 % compared to the positive control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased number of nodules by 57 % to 89 % in Polissia versus the positive control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with a new straine0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
highere0
Value
57 % to 89 %e0
Comparator
positive controle0
Setting
Polissia zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with a new strain of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Triumf and Pamiat contributed to the formation of higher number of nodules (by 57 % to 89 %), increaseed mass of nodules (2.2–2.9 times) and their nitrogenase activity (2–4 times) compared with the positive control upon cultivation in the Polissia zone on the fields where there is no population of chickpea rhizobia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased mass of nodules by 2.2–2.9 times in Polissia versus the positive control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with a new straine0
Outcome
mass of nodulese0
Direction
increaseede0
Value
2.2–2.9 timese0
Comparator
positive controle0
Setting
Polissia zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with a new strain of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Triumf and Pamiat contributed to the formation of higher number of nodules (by 57 % to 89 %), increaseed mass of nodules (2.2–2.9 times) and their nitrogenase activity (2–4 times) compared with the positive control upon cultivation in the Polissia zone on the fields where there is no population of chickpea rhizobia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased nitrogenase activity by 2–4 times in Polissia versus the positive control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Inoculation with a new straine0
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye0
Direction
increaseede0
Value
2–4 timese0
Comparator
positive controle0
Setting
Polissia zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with a new strain of chickpea seeds of varieties Skarb, Triumf and Pamiat contributed to the formation of higher number of nodules (by 57 % to 89 %), increaseed mass of nodules (2.2–2.9 times) and their nitrogenase activity (2–4 times) compared with the positive control upon cultivation in the Polissia zone on the fields where there is no population of chickpea rhizobia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased structural parameters of yield under Polissia conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64e0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
structural parameters of yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under these conditions, an increase in structural parameters of yield, the highest gain in chickpea yield, increase in photosynthetic activity and protein content in grain upon inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 was shown.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased chickpea yield under Polissia conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64e0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
chickpea yielde0
Direction
highest gaine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under these conditions, an increase in structural parameters of yield, the highest gain in chickpea yield, increase in photosynthetic activity and protein content in grain upon inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 was shown.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased photosynthetic activity under Polissia conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64e0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under these conditions, an increase in structural parameters of yield, the highest gain in chickpea yield, increase in photosynthetic activity and protein content in grain upon inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 was shown.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 inoculation increased protein content in grain under Polissia conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64e0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
protein content in graine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under these conditions, an increase in structural parameters of yield, the highest gain in chickpea yield, increase in photosynthetic activity and protein content in grain upon inoculation with M. ciceri ND-64 was shown.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1803 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antiserum detected serological relatedness among the listed Mesorhizobium strains isolated from chickpea nodules.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
serological relatednesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Obtaining a specific antisera by immunization of rabbits allowed to detect serological relatedness of M. ciceri ND-64, M. ciceri H-101, Mesorhizobium sp. ND-601 and M. ciceri ND-64, isolated from chickpea nodules of Skarb and Pamiat varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–2047 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All nodules in the ND-64 inoculation variant were formed by representatives of its serogroup.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
nodules have been formed by the representatives of M. ciceri ND-64e0
Value
100 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was found that 100 % of nodules have been formed by the representatives of M. ciceri ND-64 in the variant where this serological group was applied for inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2158–2323 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 formed an effective symbiosis across the tested varieties with or without local rhizobia.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
M. cicerіe0symbiont
Outcome
effective symbiosise0
Qualifier
both against the active local population of rhizobia and upon the absence of M. cicerі population in the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the new strain, complementary to all studied varieties differing in seed size and shape, type of bush and average height, forms an effective symbiosis for growing chickpea plants both against the active local population of rhizobia and upon the absence of M. cicerі population in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2674–2963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ND-64 seed treatment exceeded reference and variety-derived strains in symbiotic parameters.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
seed treatment with suspension of M. ciceri ND-64e0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
Symbiotic parameterse0
Direction
exceede0
Comparator
reference strain of M. ciceri H-12 and strains isolated from the nodules of each study varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symbiotic parameters upon seed treatment with suspension of M. ciceri ND-64 exceed these values in the variants with inoculation using the reference strain of M. ciceri H-12 and strains isolated from the nodules of each study variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2964–3198 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend ND-64 as a chickpea seed inoculant to improve symbiosis, productivity and seed quality.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
M. ciceri ND-64Mesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
used as a bioagent of a microbial preparation for inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. ciceri ND-64 can be used as a bioagent of a microbial preparation for inoculation of chickpea of different varieties in order to form an effective bean-rhizobial symbiosis, increase the productivity of this culture and improve seed quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3210–3453 · show in text ↑

Mesorhizobium ciceri · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Mesorhizobium ciceri · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Mesorhizobium ciceri · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.