Abstract
Seed treatment with bio-wilt X (Trichoderma harzianum) reduced the severity to 2.4 on 0–5 scale followed by bio-derma (T. viride, 2.7) and Abtec Pseudo (Pseudomonas fluorescens, 2.8). The functional nodule count decreased while an increase in non functional nodules was recorded due to inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolina. The growth and yield of infected plants was 37–59% and 38–42% lower than uninoculated plants. Seed application with bio-fungicides @ 4g/ml kg seeds reduced the severity of damage and also increased the growth and yield of infested plants. The greatest increase in growth parameters (30–36%) and yield (28–40%) was recorded with bio-wilt X (T. harzianum). T. viride (bio-derma) was next in increasing chick pea dry weight and yield by 18–29% and 25–33%, respectively followed by Abtec Pseudo that caused 18–26% and 2527% increase over pathogen inoculated plants. Abtec Bacillus did not significantly improve the growth parameters, but enhanced the yield by 19%. Soil population of M. phaseolina was significantly reduced in presence of bio-control agents.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with bio-wilt X (Trichoderma harzianum) reduced chick pea dry root rot severity to 2.4 on a 0-5 scale.
- Taxon
- Chick pea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Seed treatment with bio-wilt X (Trichoderma harzianum)e1
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen - Second interactor
- Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- severitye1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 2.4 on 0–5 scalee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Seed treatment with bio-wilt X (Trichoderma harzianum) reduced the severity to 2.4 on 0–5 scale”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-derma (T. viride) reduced chick pea dry root rot severity to 2.7 on a 0-5 scale.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- bio-dermae2
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen
- Second interactor
- T. viride
Trichoderma viridee2biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- severitye1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 2.7e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Seed treatment with bio-wilt X (Trichoderma harzianum) reduced the severity to 2.4 on 0–5 scale”
e2“followed by bio-derma (T. viride, 2.7)”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Abtec Pseudo (Pseudomonas fluorescens) reduced chick pea dry root rot severity to 2.8 on a 0-5 scale.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Abtec Pseudoe3
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescens
.JPG?width=60)
Pseudomonas fluorescense3biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- severitye1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- 2.8e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.JPG?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Seed treatment with bio-wilt X (Trichoderma harzianum) reduced the severity to 2.4 on 0–5 scale”
e3“Abtec Pseudo (Pseudomonas fluorescens, 2.8)”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolina decreased the functional nodule count of chick pea.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolinae4
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae4pathogen
- Outcome
- functional nodule counte4
- Direction
- decreasede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The functional nodule count decreased while an increase in non functional nodules was recorded due to inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolina”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolina increased the non functional nodule count of chick pea.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolinae4
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae4pathogen
- Outcome
- non functional nodulese4
- Direction
- increasee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The functional nodule count decreased while an increase in non functional nodules was recorded due to inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolina”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth of infected chick pea plants was 37–59% lower than uninoculated plants.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- infected plantse6
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen
- Outcome
- growthe6
- Direction
- lowere6
- Value
- 37–59%e6
- Comparator
- uninoculated plantse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“The growth and yield of infected plants was 37–59% and 38–42% lower than uninoculated plants”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield of infected chick pea plants was 38–42% lower than uninoculated plants.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- infected plantse6
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen
- Outcome
- yielde6
- Direction
- lowere6
- Value
- 38–42%e6
- Comparator
- uninoculated plantse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“The growth and yield of infected plants was 37–59% and 38–42% lower than uninoculated plants”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed application with bio-fungicides reduced the severity of damage to chick pea.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Seed application with bio-fungicides @ 4g/ml kg seedse7
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen
- Outcome
- severity of damagee7
- Direction
- reducede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“Seed application with bio-fungicides @ 4g/ml kg seeds reduced the severity of damage and also increased the growth and yield of infested plants”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed application with bio-fungicides increased the growth and yield of infested chick pea plants.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Seed application with bio-fungicides @ 4g/ml kg seedse7
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen
- Outcome
- growth and yielde7
- Direction
- increasede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“Seed application with bio-fungicides @ 4g/ml kg seeds reduced the severity of damage and also increased the growth and yield of infested plants”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-wilt X (T. harzianum) gave the greatest increase in chick pea growth parameters, by 30–36%.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- bio-wilt X (T. harzianum)e5
- Interactor
- T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume5biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- growth parameterse5
- Direction
- greatest increasee5
- Value
- 30–36%e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The greatest increase in growth parameters (30–36%) and yield (28–40%) was recorded with bio-wilt X (T. harzianum)”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-wilt X (T. harzianum) gave the greatest increase in chick pea yield, by 28–40%.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- bio-wilt X (T. harzianum)e5
- Interactor
- T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume5biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- greatest increasee5
- Value
- 28–40%e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The greatest increase in growth parameters (30–36%) and yield (28–40%) was recorded with bio-wilt X (T. harzianum)”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride (bio-derma) increased chick pea dry weight by 18–29%.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinume5
- Treatment
- T. viride (bio-derma)e5
- Interactor
- T. virideTrichoderma viridee5biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- dry weighte5
- Direction
- increasinge5
- Value
- 18–29%e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“T. viride (bio-derma) was next in increasing chick pea dry weight and yield by 18–29% and 25–33%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride (bio-derma) increased chick pea yield by 25–33%.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinume5
- Treatment
- T. viride (bio-derma)e5
- Interactor
- T. virideTrichoderma viridee5biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- increasinge5
- Value
- 25–33%e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“T. viride (bio-derma) was next in increasing chick pea dry weight and yield by 18–29% and 25–33%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Abtec Pseudo increased chick pea growth by 18–26% over pathogen-inoculated plants.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Abtec Pseudoe5
- Interactor
- Abtec Pseudoe5biocontrol_agent
- Direction
- increasee5
- Value
- 18–26%e5
- Comparator
- pathogen inoculated plantse5
Not reportedOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Abtec Pseudo that caused 18–26% and 2527% increase over pathogen inoculated plants”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Abtec Pseudo increased chick pea by 2527% over pathogen-inoculated plants (value as written).
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Abtec Pseudoe5
- Interactor
- Abtec Pseudoe5biocontrol_agent
- Direction
- increasee5
- Value
- 2527%e5
- Comparator
- pathogen inoculated plantse5
Not reportedOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Abtec Pseudo that caused 18–26% and 2527% increase over pathogen inoculated plants”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Abtec Bacillus did not significantly change chick pea growth parameters.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Abtec Bacilluse5
- Interactor
- Abtec Bacilluse5biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- growth parameterse5
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Abtec Bacillus did not significantly improve the growth parameters, but enhanced the yield by 19%”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Abtec Bacillus enhanced chick pea yield by 19%.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Abtec Bacilluse5
- Interactor
- Abtec Bacilluse5biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- enhancede5
- Value
- 19%e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Abtec Bacillus did not significantly improve the growth parameters, but enhanced the yield by 19%”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-control agents significantly reduced the soil population of M. phaseolina.
- Taxon
- Chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- presence of bio-control agentse5
- Interactor
- M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae5pathogen
- Outcome
- Soil population of M. phaseolinae5
- Direction
- reducede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Soil population of M. phaseolina was significantly reduced in presence of bio-control agents”
t0“dry root rot of Chick pea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”
The same questions in other papers
Macrophomina phaseolina · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Trichoderma harzianum · Macrophomina phaseolina · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Trichoderma viride · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Trichoderma viride · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
20 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Trichoderma harzianum · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
24 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
110 papers more in this group
See all 114 papers →biocontrol · Macrophomina phaseolina · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.