Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Protection Research

Evaluation of Different Measures to Control Wilt Causing Pathogens in Chickpea

Muneeb Andrabi; Amrish Vaid; Vijay Razdan

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Evaluation of Different Measures to Control Wilt Causing Pathogens in Chickpea Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri, F. solani and Rhizoctonia solani were isolated from the wilted chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ) plants. To manage the wilt complex cultural practices, use of biocontrol agents and fungicides were tried under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Sowing of chickpea at different dates revealed that early sowing (10th Oct.) resulted in maximum disease incidence (32.20%), whereas, late sowing (24th Nov.) the minimum (13.35%). Twenty and 50 cm row to row spacing resulted in maximum (29.17%) and minimum (17.35%) disease incidence respectively. In vitro evaluation of biological control agents revealed the superiority of Trichoderma viride. Trichoderma over Trichoderma virens in controlling the pathogens. Carbendazim at 100, 200, 500 ppm caused maximum per cent inhibition of the pathogens under in vitro conditions. Fungicides applied as seed treatment reduced disease incidence significantly. Seed treatment with carbendazim increased seed germination (71.24%), though it was at par with carbendazim + mancozeb (62.21%) and mancozeb (61.46%). Seed coating with T. viride resulted in minimum disease incidence (9.24%), however, it was at par with T. virens (9.72%). Maximum yield (10.10 q/ha) was recorded with the application of carbendazim, followed by carbendazim + mancozeb (9.77 q/ha) and T. viride (8.10 q/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three fungi were isolated from wilted chickpea plants.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceriFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Second interactor
F. solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
were isolated from the wilted chickpeae0
Qualifier
Rhizoctonia solanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · Second interactorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri, F. solani and Rhizoctonia solani were isolated from the wilted chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ) plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing on 10 October produced maximum wilt incidence of 32.20%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
early sowing (10th Oct.)e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
32.20%e0
Comparator
late sowing (24th Nov.)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (10th Oct.) resulted in maximum disease incidence (32.20%), whereas, late sowing (24th Nov.) the minimum (13.35%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing on 24 November produced minimum wilt incidence of 13.35%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
late sowing (24th Nov.)e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
13.35%e0
Comparator
early sowing (10th Oct.)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“early sowing (10th Oct.) resulted in maximum disease incidence (32.20%), whereas, late sowing (24th Nov.) the minimum (13.35%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty centimetre row spacing gave maximum disease incidence of 29.17%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Twentye0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
29.17%e0
Comparator
50 cm row to row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Twenty and 50 cm row to row spacing resulted in maximum (29.17%) and minimum (17.35%) disease incidence respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty centimetre row spacing gave minimum disease incidence of 17.35%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
50 cm row to row spacinge0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
17.35%e0
Comparator
Twentye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Twenty and 50 cm row to row spacing resulted in maximum (29.17%) and minimum (17.35%) disease incidence respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride was superior to Trichoderma virens in vitro for pathogen control.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Trichoderma viridee0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
controlling the pathogense0
Comparator
Trichoderma virense0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trichoderma viride. Trichoderma over Trichoderma virens in controlling the pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim at 100, 200 and 500 ppm gave maximum in vitro pathogen inhibition.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Carbendazim at 100, 200, 500 ppme0
Outcome
per cent inhibition of the pathogense0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
in vitro conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Carbendazim at 100, 200, 500 ppm caused maximum per cent inhibition of the pathogens under in vitro conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide seed treatments significantly reduced chickpea disease incidence.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Fungicides applied as seed treatmente0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fungicides applied as seed treatment reduced disease incidence significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim seed treatment increased germination to 71.24%, statistically at par with two other fungicide treatments.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
carbendazime0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
71.24%e0
Qualifier
at par with carbendazim + mancozeb (62.21%) and mancozeb (61.46%)e0
Comparator
carbendazim + mancozebe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed treatment with carbendazim increased seed germination (71.24%), though it was at par with carbendazim + mancozeb (62.21%) and mancozeb (61.46%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride seed coating gave minimum disease incidence of 9.24%, statistically at par with T. virens.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Seed coating with T. viridee0
Interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
9.24%e0
Comparator
T. virense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed coating with T. viride resulted in minimum disease incidence (9.24%), however, it was at par with T. virens (9.72%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim produced the maximum yield of 10.10 q/ha.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
carbendazime0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
10.10 q/hae0
Comparator
carbendazim + mancozebe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum yield (10.10 q/ha) was recorded with the application of carbendazim, followed by carbendazim + mancozeb (9.77 q/ha) and T. viride (8.10 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim plus mancozeb yielded 9.77 q/ha.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
carbendazim + mancozebe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
9.77 q/hae0
Comparator
carbendazime0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum yield (10.10 q/ha) was recorded with the application of carbendazim, followed by carbendazim + mancozeb (9.77 q/ha) and T. viride (8.10 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride treatment yielded 8.10 q/ha.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T. viridee0
Interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
8.10 q/hae0
Comparator
carbendazime0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum yield (10.10 q/ha) was recorded with the application of carbendazim, followed by carbendazim + mancozeb (9.77 q/ha) and T. viride (8.10 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1423 · show in text ↑

mancozeb · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

carbendazim · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

carbendazim · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Trichoderma viride · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

carbendazim · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Trichoderma viride · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

sowing time · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fungicide · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.