Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T. viride seed coating gave minimum disease incidence of 9.24%, statistically at par with T. virens.

A claim from Evaluation of Different Measures to Control Wilt Causing Pathogens in Chickpea · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride seed coating gave minimum disease incidence of 9.24%, statistically at par with T. virens.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Seed coating with T. viridee0
Interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
9.24%e0
Comparator
T. virense0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78
e0

“Seed coating with T. viride resulted in minimum disease incidence (9.24%), however, it was at par with T. virens (9.72%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1272

Title

Evaluation of Different Measures to Control Wilt Causing Pathogens in Chickpea

Muneeb Andrabi; Amrish Vaid; Vijay Razdan Journal of Plant Protection Research 2011. doi:10.2478/v10045-011-0010-3

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e087147855b5b0dc42267876eb87b8fe6fb2004dedae5ade09c3bf60743ca3e3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

Trichoderma viride · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 35 positive, 4 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.