Paper · 2022 · Plant Science Today

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of different measures to control Ascochyta blight in chickpea

Saima Naseer; Yasir Ali; Azher Mustafa; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ascochyta blight, an infection caused by Ascochyta rabiei is a destructive disease in many chickpea growing regions and it caused significant yield losses. To minimize the impact of Ascochyta blight, 5 fungicides viz., Aliette, Cabrio Top, Thiovit Jet, Cymoxanil and Difenoconazole, 5 plants extracts namely Azadirachta indica, Azadirachta azedarach, Datura stramonium, Chenopodium album and Allium sativum L. and two strains T-22 and E58 of bio-control agents (BCAs) Trichoderma viride and Aspergillus flavus were evaluated on the growth of A. rabiei under in vitro conditions by using the food poison technique. The colony growth of Ascochyta rabiei was inhibited at all concentrations of fungicides @ 0.07, 0.15, 0.21%, plants extracts @ 4, 6, 9% and bio-control agents @ 105, 106 and 107 conidia ml-1 respectively. Among all applied treatments, maximum inhibition colony growth of pathogen was recorded in the case of Aliette (83.4%), followed by Cabrio Top (74.3%), Azadirachta indica (50.3%) and Trichoderma viride (60.3%) at their high concentrations. Field trials showed that Aliette and Cabario Top significantly reduced the disease severity to 10 % and 24% respectively, followed by Azadirachta indica and Allium sativum which reduced the disease severity to 40% and 50% respectively. Bio-control agent Trichoderma viride proved less effective in controlling Ascochyta bight severity under field conditions. The present study showed that systemic and sulphur containing fungicides, plant extracts and bio-control agents (BCAs) have the potential to control Ascochyta blight in both in vitro and in vivo conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested fungicide concentrations inhibited A. rabiei colony growth in vitro.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
fungicides @ 0.07, 0.15, 0.21%e0
Interactor
Ascochyta rabieiAscochyta rabieie0pathogen
Outcome
colony growth of Ascochyta rabieie0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ascochyta rabiei
Ascochyta rabiei · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDr. Weidong Chen Research Plant Pathologist · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The colony growth of Ascochyta rabiei was inhibited at all concentrations of fungicides @ 0.07, 0.15, 0.21%, plants extracts @ 4, 6, 9% and bio-control agents @ 105, 106 and 107 conidia ml-1 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested plant extract concentrations inhibited A. rabiei colony growth in vitro.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
plants extracts @ 4, 6, 9%e0
Interactor
Ascochyta rabieiAscochyta rabieie0pathogen
Outcome
colony growth of Ascochyta rabieie0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ascochyta rabiei
Ascochyta rabiei · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDr. Weidong Chen Research Plant Pathologist · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The colony growth of Ascochyta rabiei was inhibited at all concentrations of fungicides @ 0.07, 0.15, 0.21%, plants extracts @ 4, 6, 9% and bio-control agents @ 105, 106 and 107 conidia ml-1 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested biocontrol concentrations inhibited A. rabiei colony growth in vitro.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
bio-control agents @ 105, 106 and 107 conidia ml-1e0
Interactor
Ascochyta rabieiAscochyta rabieie0pathogen
Outcome
colony growth of Ascochyta rabieie0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ascochyta rabiei
Ascochyta rabiei · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDr. Weidong Chen Research Plant Pathologist · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The colony growth of Ascochyta rabiei was inhibited at all concentrations of fungicides @ 0.07, 0.15, 0.21%, plants extracts @ 4, 6, 9% and bio-control agents @ 105, 106 and 107 conidia ml-1 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aliette inhibited pathogen colony growth by 83.4% at a high concentration.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Aliettee0
Outcome
inhibition colony growth of pathogene0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
83.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all applied treatments, maximum inhibition colony growth of pathogen was recorded in the case of Aliette (83.4%), followed by Cabrio Top (74.3%), Azadirachta indica (50.3%) and Trichoderma viride (60.3%) at their high concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabrio Top inhibited pathogen colony growth by 74.3% at a high concentration.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Cabrio Tope0
Outcome
inhibition colony growth of pathogene0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
74.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all applied treatments, maximum inhibition colony growth of pathogen was recorded in the case of Aliette (83.4%), followed by Cabrio Top (74.3%), Azadirachta indica (50.3%) and Trichoderma viride (60.3%) at their high concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica inhibited pathogen colony growth by 50.3% at a high concentration.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Azadirachta indicae0
Outcome
inhibition colony growth of pathogene0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
50.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all applied treatments, maximum inhibition colony growth of pathogen was recorded in the case of Aliette (83.4%), followed by Cabrio Top (74.3%), Azadirachta indica (50.3%) and Trichoderma viride (60.3%) at their high concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride inhibited pathogen colony growth by 60.3% at a high concentration.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Trichoderma viridee0
Outcome
inhibition colony growth of pathogene0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
60.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all applied treatments, maximum inhibition colony growth of pathogen was recorded in the case of Aliette (83.4%), followed by Cabrio Top (74.3%), Azadirachta indica (50.3%) and Trichoderma viride (60.3%) at their high concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aliette reduced field disease severity to 10 %.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Aliettee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10 %e0
Setting
Field trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials showed that Aliette and Cabario Top significantly reduced the disease severity to 10 % and 24% respectively, followed by Azadirachta indica and Allium sativum which reduced the disease severity to 40% and 50% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabario Top reduced field disease severity to 24%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Cabario Tope0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24%e0
Setting
Field trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials showed that Aliette and Cabario Top significantly reduced the disease severity to 10 % and 24% respectively, followed by Azadirachta indica and Allium sativum which reduced the disease severity to 40% and 50% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica reduced field disease severity to 40%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Azadirachta indicae0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
40%e0
Setting
Field trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials showed that Aliette and Cabario Top significantly reduced the disease severity to 10 % and 24% respectively, followed by Azadirachta indica and Allium sativum which reduced the disease severity to 40% and 50% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allium sativum reduced field disease severity to 50%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Allium sativume0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0
Setting
Field trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials showed that Aliette and Cabario Top significantly reduced the disease severity to 10 % and 24% respectively, followed by Azadirachta indica and Allium sativum which reduced the disease severity to 40% and 50% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride was less effective against Ascochyta blight in the field.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Trichoderma viridee0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Ascochyta bight severitye0
Direction
less effectivee0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bio-control agent Trichoderma viride proved less effective in controlling Ascochyta bight severity under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–93 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma viride · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Allium sativum · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azadirachta indica · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fungicide · Ascochyta rabiei · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

biocontrol · Ascochyta rabiei · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Ascochyta rabiei · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.