Paper · 2016 · Progressive Agriculture

Effect of Polythene Mulching, Raised Bed Planting and Dates of Sowing on Wilt Incidence of Chickpea

Shalini Singh Visen

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with four replications to assess the effect of soil solarization and raised bed planting on incidence of chickpea wilt and grain yield. Result revealed that maximum wilt incidence (20.1%) was observed in early sown plots i.e on November 8 while minimum wilt 5.7% incidence was in late sown plots i.e November 28. There was gradual reduction in disease incidence as the date of sowing was delayed but it increased slightly after December 6. In both the season, Raised bed planting showed maximum disease incidence 20.8% and minimum grain yield 646.7kg/h in comparison to flat beds. Soil solarization with black polyethylene, gave minimum disease incidence (14.5%)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing (8 November) gave the highest chickpea wilt incidence, 20.1%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
early sown plotse1
Outcome
wilt incidencee1
Direction
maximume1
Value
20.1%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wilt Incidence of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum wilt incidence (20.1%) was observed in early sown plots i.e on November 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing (28 November) gave the lowest chickpea wilt incidence, 5.7%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
late sown plotse2
Outcome
wilt incidencee1
Direction
minimume2
Value
5.7%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wilt Incidence of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum wilt incidence (20.1%) was observed in early sown plots i.e on November 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“minimum wilt 5.7% incidence was in late sown plots i.e November 28”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–379 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence gradually decreased as chickpea sowing was delayed.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
date of sowinge3
Outcome
disease incidencee3
Direction
gradual reductione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wilt Incidence of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was gradual reduction in disease incidence as the date of sowing was delayed but it increased slightly after December 6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–506 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence increased slightly in chickpea sown after 6 December.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
date of sowinge3
Outcome
disease incidencee3
Direction
increased slightlye3
Qualifier
after December 6e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wilt Incidence of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was gradual reduction in disease incidence as the date of sowing was delayed but it increased slightly after December 6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting gave the highest chickpea disease incidence, 20.8%, compared with flat beds.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Raised bed plantinge4
Outcome
disease incidencee4
Direction
maximume4
Value
20.8%e4
Comparator
flat bedse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wilt Incidence of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Raised bed planting showed maximum disease incidence 20.8% and minimum grain yield 646.7kg/h in comparison to flat beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting gave the lowest chickpea grain yield, 646.7 kg/h, compared with flat beds.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Raised bed plantinge4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
minimume4
Value
646.7kg/he4
Comparator
flat bedse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wilt Incidence of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Raised bed planting showed maximum disease incidence 20.8% and minimum grain yield 646.7kg/h in comparison to flat beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil solarization with black polyethylene gave the lowest chickpea disease incidence, 14.5%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Soil solarization with black polyethylenee5
Outcome
disease incidencee5
Direction
minimume5
Value
14.5%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wilt Incidence of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–99 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soil solarization with black polyethylene, gave minimum disease incidence (14.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–730 · show in text ↑

sowing time · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.