Abstract
Experiments were conducted at the University Agricultural Research Farm for the two consecutive years, 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 to study the individual and interactive effects of different plant symbionts (Glomus fasciculatum, Mesorhizobium ciceri), bio-organic waste (Avena sativa straw) and antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma harzianum in all possible combinations for biocontrol of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting chickpea var. Avrodhi. Biocontrol agents and organic wastes were evaluated for their efficacy in terms of growth characteristics, chlorophyll content, nutrients status, mycorrhization and nematode-related parameters. Combined treatments resulted in higher plant growth, biomass, chlorophyll and nutrient status (N, P and K). Antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma harzianum @ 106 spores plant−1 proved to be most effective of all the plant symbionts (G. fasciculatum, M. ciceri) and organic waste in suppressing the nematode-related parameters in chickpea plants. Of all the treatments, combined inoculation of AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum @ 800 spores plant−1) + root-nodulating bacteria (Mesorhizobium ciceri @ 1gplant−1) + organic waste (Avena sativa straw @ 10gplant−1) and antagonistic fungi (Trichoderma harzianum @ 106 spores plant−1) was found to be the most efficient in improving the plant growth parameters and decreasing the root-knot development of M. incognita in chickpea plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatments increased chickpea growth and biomass.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- Combined treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Outcome
- plant growth, biomasse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Combined treatments resulted in higher plant growth, biomass, chlorophyll and nutrient status (N, P and K).”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatments increased chickpea chlorophyll and nutrient status.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- Combined treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Outcome
- chlorophyll and nutrient status (N, P and K)e0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Combined treatments resulted in higher plant growth, biomass, chlorophyll and nutrient status (N, P and K).”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma harzianum was the most effective treatment for suppressing nematode parameters.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- Trichoderma harzianum @ 106 spores plant−1e0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Second interactor
- Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- nematode-related parameterse0
- Direction
- suppressinge0
- Comparator
- plant symbionts (G. fasciculatum, M. ciceri) and organic wastee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)

Verbatim
e0“Trichoderma harzianum @ 106 spores plant−1 proved to be most effective of all the plant symbionts (G. fasciculatum, M. ciceri) and organic waste in suppressing the nematode-related parameters in chickpea plants”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita infecting chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The four-component combination was most efficient at improving chickpea growth.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- combined inoculation of AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum @ 800 spores plant−1) + root-nodulating bacteria (Mesorhizobium ciceri @ 1gplant−1) + organic waste (Avena sativa straw @ 10gplant−1) and antagonistic fungi (Trichoderma harzianum @ 106 spores plant−1)e0
- Interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant growth parameterse0
- Direction
- improvinge0
- Qualifier
- Trichoderma harzianume0
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“combined inoculation of AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum @ 800 spores plant−1) + root-nodulating bacteria (Mesorhizobium ciceri @ 1gplant−1) + organic waste (Avena sativa straw @ 10gplant−1) and antagonistic fungi (Trichoderma harzianum @ 106 spores plant−1) was found to be the most efficient in improving the plant growth parameters and decreasing the root-knot development of M. incognita in chickpea plants”
e1“Of all the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The four-component combination was most efficient at reducing chickpea root-knot development.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- combined inoculation of AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum @ 800 spores plant−1) + root-nodulating bacteria (Mesorhizobium ciceri @ 1gplant−1) + organic waste (Avena sativa straw @ 10gplant−1) and antagonistic fungi (Trichoderma harzianum @ 106 spores plant−1)e0
- Interactor
- M. incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Second interactor
- Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- root-knot development of M. incognitae0
- Direction
- decreasinge0
- Qualifier
- Glomus fasciculatume0
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)

Verbatim
e0“combined inoculation of AM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum @ 800 spores plant−1) + root-nodulating bacteria (Mesorhizobium ciceri @ 1gplant−1) + organic waste (Avena sativa straw @ 10gplant−1) and antagonistic fungi (Trichoderma harzianum @ 106 spores plant−1) was found to be the most efficient in improving the plant growth parameters and decreasing the root-knot development of M. incognita in chickpea plants”
e1“Of all the treatments”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizophagus fasciculatus · Meloidogyne incognita · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Mesorhizobium ciceri · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
20 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
148 papers more in this group
See all 152 papers →mycorrhiza · Meloidogyne incognita · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.