Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ELISA values were significantly reduced in T. harzianum-amended treatments compared with the untreated soil.

A claim from Evaluation of a polyclonal antibody immunoassay for detection and quantification of Macrophomina phaseolina · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ELISA values were significantly reduced in T. harzianum-amended treatments compared with the untreated soil.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume5
Treatment
soil amended with a potential antagoniste4
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae5pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
ELISA valuese2
Direction
reductione2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“A significant reduction in ELISA values was observed in T. harzianum ‐amended treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1072
e4

“in soil amended with a potential antagonist”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–951
e5

“Mycelial antigens of M. phaseolina on chickpea roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–669

Title

Evaluation of a polyclonal antibody immunoassay for detection and quantification of Macrophomina phaseolina

A. K. SRIVASTAVA; D. K. ARORA Plant Pathology 1997. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-64.x

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-4eaa9b8148fafcc048afba3c7ddb6185b7f7d534f9cf1caa0e98749b9642e4f5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

biocontrol · Macrophomina phaseolina · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.