Abstract
The present study was conducted to investigate growth and symbiotic performance of selected salt tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars under arid saline soil conditions. Plants were grown in saline soil of Syrdarya province, Uzbekistan. The results showed that the growth and nodulation of chickpea cultivars Uzbekiston-32, Xalima, Miroz, Flip 1-33 and CIEW 45 were much better under saline conditions compared other chickpea cultivars. Inoculation of salt tolerant chickpea cultivars with M. ciceri IC53 significantly increased numbers of nodules on the roots (300%), shoot and root dry weight (27%), pod numbers (28%) and yield (23%). The above results revealed that for achieving the highest symbiotic effectiveness under salinity conditions plant cultivars have to be taken into account. It could be suggested that cultivation of salt tolerant cultivars with its symbiotic partners
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Five chickpea cultivars had better growth than other cultivars under saline conditions.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Material
- Uzbekiston-32, Xalima, Miroz, Flip 1-33 and CIEW 45e0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- much bettere0
- Comparator
- other chickpea cultivarse0
- Setting
- saline conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth and nodulation of chickpea cultivars Uzbekiston-32, Xalima, Miroz, Flip 1-33 and CIEW 45 were much better under saline conditions compared other chickpea cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Five chickpea cultivars had better nodulation than other cultivars under saline conditions.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- Uzbekiston-32, Xalima, Miroz, Flip 1-33 and CIEW 45e0
- Outcome
- nodulatione0
- Direction
- much bettere0
- Comparator
- other chickpea cultivarse0
- Setting
- saline conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the growth and nodulation of chickpea cultivars Uzbekiston-32, Xalima, Miroz, Flip 1-33 and CIEW 45 were much better under saline conditions compared other chickpea cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation with M. ciceri IC53 increased chickpea root nodule number by 300%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- salt tolerant chickpea cultivarse0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of salt tolerant chickpea cultivars with M. ciceri IC53e0
- Interactor
- M. ciceri IC53e0symbiont
- Outcome
- numbers of nodules on the rootse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 300%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of salt tolerant chickpea cultivars with M. ciceri IC53 significantly increased numbers of nodules on the roots (300%), shoot and root dry weight (27%), pod numbers (28%) and yield (23%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation with M. ciceri IC53 increased chickpea shoot and root dry weight by 27%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- salt tolerant chickpea cultivarse0
- Organ / stage
- shoot and roote0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of salt tolerant chickpea cultivars with M. ciceri IC53e0
- Interactor
- M. ciceri IC53e0symbiont
- Outcome
- shoot and root dry weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 27%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of salt tolerant chickpea cultivars with M. ciceri IC53 significantly increased numbers of nodules on the roots (300%), shoot and root dry weight (27%), pod numbers (28%) and yield (23%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation with M. ciceri IC53 increased chickpea pod numbers by 28%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- salt tolerant chickpea cultivarse0
- Organ / stage
- pode0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of salt tolerant chickpea cultivars with M. ciceri IC53e0
- Interactor
- M. ciceri IC53e0symbiont
- Outcome
- pod numberse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 28%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of salt tolerant chickpea cultivars with M. ciceri IC53 significantly increased numbers of nodules on the roots (300%), shoot and root dry weight (27%), pod numbers (28%) and yield (23%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation with M. ciceri IC53 increased chickpea yield by 23%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- salt tolerant chickpea cultivarse0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of salt tolerant chickpea cultivars with M. ciceri IC53e0
- Interactor
- M. ciceri IC53e0symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 23%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of salt tolerant chickpea cultivars with M. ciceri IC53 significantly increased numbers of nodules on the roots (300%), shoot and root dry weight (27%), pod numbers (28%) and yield (23%).”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest cultivating salt tolerant chickpea cultivars with their symbiotic partners under salinity.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Outcome
- cultivation of salt tolerant cultivars with its symbiotic partnerse0
- Qualifier
- arid saline soil conditionse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It could be suggested that cultivation of salt tolerant cultivars with its symbiotic partners”
e1“chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars under arid saline soil conditions.”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
110 papers more in this group
See all 114 papers →inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
148 papers more in this group
See all 152 papers →inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.