Abstract
A total of 330 chickpea genotypes were screened for resistance to Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris in a wilt-infected plot at Hudeiba Research Station, Ed-Damer, Sudan. The released kabuli cv. Shendi (NEC 2491/ILC 1335) and Jebel Marra-1 (ILC 915), and the widely-grown kabuli cv. Baladi were highly susceptible to Fusarium wilt. Conversely, kabuli cv. ICCV 2 and UC 15, and desi genotypes FLIP 85-20C, FLIP 85- 29C and FLIP 85-30C were highly resistant to the disease with less than 10% wilt incidence. ‘ICCV 2’ matured about 4 to 5 weeks earlier than the other four resistant chickpea genotypes. Two field trials were also conducted to verify the resistance of cv. ICCV 2 and the efficacy of the seed-dressing fungicides Tecto-TM and Quinolate Pro for control of Fusarium wilt. One trial was carried out in the wilt-infected plot and the other in farmers’ fields with a history of high disease incidence. In both trials, cv. ICCV 2 showed a good level of resistance to wilt and produced twice the grain yield of cv. Baladi in farmers’ fields. Both seed-dressing fungicides significantly increased seedling emergence in the wilt-infected plot, but neither significantly decreased the final incidence of dead plants, or increased the grain yield in the infected plot or the farmers’ fields. Results of this study indicate that cv. ICCV 2 is a potential variety for release in the traditional chickpea-producing areas of Sudan where Fusarium wilt and late-season soil moisture stress are major constraints to production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Shendi, Jebel Marra-1 and Baladi were highly susceptible to Fusarium wilt.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Outcome
- highly susceptible to Fusarium wilte0
FusariumNot reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The released kabuli cv. Shendi (NEC 2491/ILC 1335) and Jebel Marra-1 (ILC 915), and the widely-grown kabuli cv. Baladi were highly susceptible to Fusarium wilt.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
ICCV 2 and UC 15 were highly resistant with under 10% wilt incidence.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- ICCV 2 and UC 15e0
- Outcome
- wilt incidencee0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Value
- 10%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“kabuli cv. ICCV 2 and UC 15, and desi genotypes FLIP 85-20C, FLIP 85- 29C and FLIP 85-30C were highly resistant to the disease with less than 10% wilt incidence.”
t0“Fusarium wilt of chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
FLIP 85-20C, FLIP 85- 29C and FLIP 85-30C were highly resistant with under 10% wilt incidence.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- FLIP 85-20C, FLIP 85- 29C and FLIP 85-30Ce0
- Outcome
- wilt incidencee0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Value
- 10%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“desi genotypes FLIP 85-20C, FLIP 85- 29C and FLIP 85-30C were highly resistant to the disease with less than 10% wilt incidence.”
t0“Fusarium wilt of chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
ICCV 2 matured 4–5 weeks earlier than the other resistant genotypes.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- ICCV 2e0
- Outcome
- maturede0
- Direction
- earliere0
- Value
- 4 to 5 weekse0
- Comparator
- the other four resistant chickpea genotypese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘ICCV 2’ matured about 4 to 5 weeks earlier than the other four resistant chickpea genotypes.”
Claim · model-written summary
ICCV 2 retained good wilt resistance in both field trials.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- ICCV 2e0
- Outcome
- good level of resistance to wilte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In both trials, cv. ICCV 2 showed a good level of resistance to wilt”
t0“Fusarium wilt of chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
ICCV 2 yielded twice as much grain as Baladi in farmers’ fields.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- ICCV 2e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- twicee0
- Value
- twicee0
- Comparator
- Baladie0
- Setting
- farmers’ fieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“produced twice the grain yield of cv. Baladi in farmers’ fields”
t0“chickpea”
e1“cv. ICCV 2 showed a good level of resistance to wilt”
Claim · model-written summary
Tecto-TM seed dressing significantly increased seedling emergence in the infected plot.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Tecto-TMe1
- Outcome
- seedling emergencee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- wilt-infected plote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both seed-dressing fungicides significantly increased seedling emergence in the wilt-infected plot”
t0“Fusarium wilt of chickpea”
e1“seed-dressing fungicides Tecto-TM and Quinolate Pro”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinolate Pro seed dressing significantly increased seedling emergence in the infected plot.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Quinolate Proe1
- Outcome
- seedling emergencee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- wilt-infected plote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both seed-dressing fungicides significantly increased seedling emergence in the wilt-infected plot”
t0“Fusarium wilt of chickpea”
e1“seed-dressing fungicides Tecto-TM and Quinolate Pro”
Claim · model-written summary
Neither seed dressing significantly decreased final dead-plant incidence.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- seed-dressing fungicidese1
- Outcome
- final incidence of dead plantse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“neither significantly decreased the final incidence of dead plants”
t0“Fusarium wilt of chickpea”
e1“Both seed-dressing fungicides significantly increased seedling emergence”
Claim · model-written summary
Neither seed dressing significantly increased grain yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- seed-dressing fungicidese1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- infected plot or the farmers’ fieldse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“or increased the grain yield in the infected plot or the farmers’ fields”
t0“Fusarium wilt of chickpea”
e1“Both seed-dressing fungicides significantly increased seedling emergence”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors identify ICCV 2 as a potential release variety in traditional production areas.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- ICCV 2e0
- Outcome
- potential variety for releasee0
- Setting
- Sudane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cv. ICCV 2 is a potential variety for release in the traditional chickpea-producing areas of Sudan where Fusarium wilt and late-season soil moisture stress are major constraints to production.”
The same questions in other papers
fungicide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →fungicide · Fusarium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
seed treatment · Fusarium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.