Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Natoli with Goldazim and vermicompost had the lowest wilt incidence, 0.35%, at Fogera.

A claim from Synergistic effect of seed dressing fungicides, vermicompost application and varieties on Fusarium wilt intensity, yield, and yield components of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natoli with Goldazim and vermicompost had the lowest wilt incidence, 0.35%, at Fogera.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Natolie0
Treatment
Goldazim 500SC seed dressing fungicide and supplemented with vermicomposte0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
wilt incidencese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.35%e0
Setting
Fogera sitee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Natoli variety when treated with Goldazim 500SC seed dressing fungicide and supplemented with vermicompost showed the lowest wilt incidences (0.35%) and percent severity index (PSI) (0.6%) at Fogera site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–867
t0

“Fusarium wilt intensity, yield, and yield components of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–154

Title

Synergistic effect of seed dressing fungicides, vermicompost application and varieties on Fusarium wilt intensity, yield, and yield components of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)

Abebe Yilma; Merkuz Abera; Berhanu Bekele; et al. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience 2025. doi:10.1079/ab.2025.0076

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-5fcadf5019dfcdd96bb0fbe7abad1360fb78f081a5e10053760041f29b2bb862 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fungicide · Fusarium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · Fusarium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · Fusarium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.