Paper · 2021 · Ciência e Agrotecnologia

Inoculation of Bacillus spp. and nitrogen levels increase chickpea production

Maria Nilfa Almeida Neta; Elaine Soares de Almeida; Cândido Alves da Costa; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Chickpea growth and yield are related to the balanced supply of N. In weathered soils, this factor depends on the biological activity of growth-promoting bacteria, the presence of diazotrophic bacteria, and the management of nitrogen fertilization. In this regard, this study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of inoculation with a mix of Bacillus spp. and N levels on chickpea cultivation. Two experiments were carried out: area 01, characterized by shortest cultivation time and area 02, with the longest cultivation time. For both studies, the experimental design was in randomized blocks with four replications arranged in a 2 x 6 factorial consisting of the absence or presence of the mix of Bacillus spp. (1 x 107 CFU per mL) from root isolates and six N levels: 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 kg ha-1. The chickpea production and yield characteristics were evaluated. In the area 01, inoculation with the mix of Bacillus spp. did not interfere with grain yield, whereas the application of lower N levels (25 kg ha-1) increased the dry mass of branches, grains, total dry mass, and yield (4.17 t ha-1). In contrast, in the area 02, nitrogen fertilization increased the chlorophyll index but did not interfere with the remaining production variables, whereas inoculation with Bacillus spp. increased chickpea yield by 4%, resulting in a grain harvest of 4.16 t ha-1. Therefore, inoculation of chickpea seeds with the mix of Bacillus spp. is recommended in soils with long-time cultivation of agricultural species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In area 01, inoculation with the mix of Bacillus spp. did not interfere with chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculation with the mix of Bacillus spp.e1
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e1symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
did not interferee1
Comparator
absencee2
Setting
area 01e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the area 01, inoculation with the mix of Bacillus spp. did not interfere with grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 · show in text ↑
e2

“the absence or presence of the mix of Bacillus spp. (1 x 107 CFU per mL) from root isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In area 01, the application of lower N levels (25 kg ha-1) increased the dry mass of branches, grains and total dry mass.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
the application of lower N levels (25 kg ha-1)e3
Outcome
dry mass of branches, grains, total dry masse3
Direction
increasede3
Setting
area 01e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the area 01, inoculation with the mix of Bacillus spp. did not interfere with grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas the application of lower N levels (25 kg ha-1) increased the dry mass of branches, grains, total dry mass, and yield (4.17 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In area 01, the application of lower N levels (25 kg ha-1) increased chickpea yield to 4.17 t/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
the application of lower N levels (25 kg ha-1)e3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
4.17 t ha-1e3
Setting
area 01e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the area 01, inoculation with the mix of Bacillus spp. did not interfere with grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas the application of lower N levels (25 kg ha-1) increased the dry mass of branches, grains, total dry mass, and yield (4.17 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In area 02, nitrogen fertilization increased the chlorophyll index of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione4
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
area 02e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the area 02, nitrogen fertilization increased the chlorophyll index but did not interfere with the remaining production variables”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1127–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In area 02, nitrogen fertilization did not interfere with the remaining production variables of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione4
Outcome
remaining production variablese4
Direction
did not interferee4
Setting
area 02e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the area 02, nitrogen fertilization increased the chlorophyll index but did not interfere with the remaining production variables”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1127–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In area 02, inoculation with Bacillus spp. increased chickpea yield by 4%, resulting in a grain harvest of 4.16 t/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculation with Bacillus spp.e5
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e5symbiont
Outcome
chickpea yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Value
4%e5
Qualifier
resulting in a grain harvest of 4.16 t ha-1e5
Setting
area 02e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the area 02, nitrogen fertilization increased the chlorophyll index but did not interfere with the remaining production variables”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1127–1259 · show in text ↑
e5

“whereas inoculation with Bacillus spp. increased chickpea yield by 4%, resulting in a grain harvest of 4.16 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1375 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of chickpea seeds with the mix of Bacillus spp. is recommended in soils with long-time cultivation of agricultural species.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e6symbiont
Outcome
inoculation of chickpea seeds with the mix of Bacillus spp.e6
Setting
soils with long-time cultivatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“inoculation of chickpea seeds with the mix of Bacillus spp. is recommended in soils with long-time cultivation of agricultural species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1522 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 326 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.