Paper · 2017 · Compost Science & Utilization

Influence of Vermicompost Fertilizer and Water Deficit Stress on Morpho-Physiological Features of Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.cv. karaj)

Hamzeh Amiri; Ahmad Ismaili; Saeed Reza Hosseinzadeh

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
54
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

One goal in the face of deficit water conditions is to increase growth and yield. Agro-industrial production frequently causes environmental pollution by using chemical fertilizers. In recent decades, bio-fertilizers such as vermicompost have been used as a safe alternative to chemical fertilizer. The present study considered the response of the chickpea to different combinations of vermicompost and water deficit stress in a greenhouse environment. Plant response was determined by measuring a range of morpho-physiologic parameters. The treatments were addition of 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% of vermicompost to soil, and water deficit stress at the following levels: non-stress (100% of field capacity), moderate water stress (75% of field capacity), and severe water stress (25% of field capacity). The results showed that vermicompost had a significant effect on all traits under stress and non-stress conditions. The vermicompost treatments under non-stress conditions significantly increased plant height, number of pods, leaf area, stem and leaf dry weight, pod dry weight, chlorophyll a, carotenoid, total chlorophyll content, CO2 assimilation rate, internal CO2 concentration, and water-use efficiency over that of the control condition. The addition of 30% vermicompost under moderate and severe water stress conditions significantly increased plant height, number of pods, leaf area, leaf dry weight, carotenoids, and water-use efficiency over that of the control level. This study confirmed that vermicompost improved the morphological features, soil biological activity, and quality of the chickpea, but did not positively influence the physiological features under moderate and severe water deficit stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under non-stress conditions vermicompost increased chickpea height, pod number and leaf area.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicompost treatmentse0
Outcome
plant height, number of pods, leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
non-stress conditionse0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.cv. karaj)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“The vermicompost treatments under non-stress conditions significantly increased plant height, number of pods, leaf area, stem and leaf dry weight, pod dry weight, chlorophyll a, carotenoid, total chlorophyll content, CO2 assimilation rate, internal CO2 concentration, and water-use efficiency over that of the control condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under non-stress conditions vermicompost increased stem, leaf and pod dry weight.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicompost treatmentse0
Outcome
stem and leaf dry weight, pod dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
non-stress conditionse0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.cv. karaj)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“The vermicompost treatments under non-stress conditions significantly increased plant height, number of pods, leaf area, stem and leaf dry weight, pod dry weight, chlorophyll a, carotenoid, total chlorophyll content, CO2 assimilation rate, internal CO2 concentration, and water-use efficiency over that of the control condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under non-stress conditions vermicompost increased chlorophyll a, carotenoid and total chlorophyll.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicompost treatmentse0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, carotenoid, total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
non-stress conditionse0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.cv. karaj)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“The vermicompost treatments under non-stress conditions significantly increased plant height, number of pods, leaf area, stem and leaf dry weight, pod dry weight, chlorophyll a, carotenoid, total chlorophyll content, CO2 assimilation rate, internal CO2 concentration, and water-use efficiency over that of the control condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under non-stress conditions vermicompost increased CO2 assimilation, internal CO2 and water-use efficiency.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicompost treatmentse0
Outcome
CO2 assimilation rate, internal CO2 concentration, and water-use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
non-stress conditionse0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.cv. karaj)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“The vermicompost treatments under non-stress conditions significantly increased plant height, number of pods, leaf area, stem and leaf dry weight, pod dry weight, chlorophyll a, carotenoid, total chlorophyll content, CO2 assimilation rate, internal CO2 concentration, and water-use efficiency over that of the control condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At moderate and severe water stress, 30% vermicompost increased chickpea height, pod number and leaf area.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
30% vermicomposte0
Outcome
plant height, number of pods, leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
moderate and severe water stress conditionse0
Comparator
control levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.cv. karaj)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of 30% vermicompost under moderate and severe water stress conditions significantly increased plant height, number of pods, leaf area, leaf dry weight, carotenoids, and water-use efficiency over that of the control level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At moderate and severe water stress, 30% vermicompost increased leaf dry weight.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
30% vermicomposte0
Outcome
leaf dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
moderate and severe water stress conditionse0
Comparator
control levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.cv. karaj)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of 30% vermicompost under moderate and severe water stress conditions significantly increased plant height, number of pods, leaf area, leaf dry weight, carotenoids, and water-use efficiency over that of the control level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At moderate and severe water stress, 30% vermicompost increased carotenoids and water-use efficiency.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
30% vermicomposte0
Outcome
carotenoids, and water-use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
moderate and severe water stress conditionse0
Comparator
control levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.cv. karaj)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“The addition of 30% vermicompost under moderate and severe water stress conditions significantly increased plant height, number of pods, leaf area, leaf dry weight, carotenoids, and water-use efficiency over that of the control level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that vermicompost improved chickpea morphological features and quality.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
morphological features, soil biological activity, and qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.cv. karaj)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study confirmed that vermicompost improved the morphological features, soil biological activity, and quality of the chickpea, but did not positively influence the physiological features under moderate and severe water deficit stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that vermicompost did not positively influence chickpea physiology under moderate and severe water deficit.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
physiological featurese0
Direction
did not positively influencee0
Qualifier
moderate and severe water deficit stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.cv. karaj)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“vermicompost improved the morphological features, soil biological activity, and quality of the chickpea, but did not positively influence the physiological features under moderate and severe water deficit stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1718 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.