Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilizer along with seed decreased emergence percentage.

A claim from EFFECT OF FERTILIZATION AND SEED SIZE ON NODULATION, YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) · 2017

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer along with seed decreased emergence percentage.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
application of fertilizer along with seed during the sowing timee0
Outcome
emergence percentage of the seedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–112
e0

“application of fertilizer along with seed during the sowing time results in decreased emergence percentage of the seeds and lower the yield in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1352

Title

EFFECT OF FERTILIZATION AND SEED SIZE ON NODULATION, YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)

I. ERDEMCİ Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2017. doi:10.15666/aeer/1501_563571

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2d1f2edc4f10f2f5131b526be7faea6dd9d3467104c2d1420fff30780cdb2f5f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

sowing time · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 99 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.