Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of sowing time, spacing and nipping on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under irrigated condition

Sonendra Kumar; RS Khande; HL Sonboir; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled was carried out on effect of sowing time, spacing and nipping on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under irrigated condition during rabi season of 2016-17 at Instructional cum Research Farm, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The soil of the experiment field was clay (Vertisols) in texture with neutral soil reaction, low in available nitrogen, medium in phosphorus and high in potassium content. The experimental was laid out in split-split design with three replications. The treatments comprised of four sowing time viz., first week of November (D1), third week of November (D2), first week of December (D3) and third week of December (D4) in main plot and three spacing viz., 30 cm (S1), 40 cm (S2) and 50 cm (S3) in sub plot and three nipping viz., no nipping (N1), one at nipping 30 DAS (N2) and one nipping at 40 DAS (N3) in sub-sub plot. The test variety was JG-130. The results of the experiment indicated that the growth parameter viz., plant height, number of branches plant-1 (34.96), dry matter accumulation plant-1 (40.18 g), number of nodules plant-1 (45.93), dry weight of nodules plant-1 (0.72 g) and leaf area index (4.86) were maximum at 3rd week of November sowing time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third-week November sowing maximized plant height and branches per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
3rd week of November sowing timee0
Outcome
number of branches plant-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
34.96e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, number of branches plant-1 (34.96), dry matter accumulation plant-1 (40.18 g), number of nodules plant-1 (45.93), dry weight of nodules plant-1 (0.72 g) and leaf area index (4.86) were maximum at 3rd week of November sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third-week November sowing maximized dry matter accumulation at 40.18 g per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
3rd week of November sowing timee0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation plant-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
40.18 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter accumulation plant-1 (40.18 g), number of nodules plant-1 (45.93), dry weight of nodules plant-1 (0.72 g) and leaf area index (4.86) were maximum at 3rd week of November sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third-week November sowing maximized nodule number at 45.93 per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
3rd week of November sowing timee0
Outcome
number of nodules plant-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
45.93e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of nodules plant-1 (45.93), dry weight of nodules plant-1 (0.72 g) and leaf area index (4.86) were maximum at 3rd week of November sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third-week November sowing maximized nodule dry weight at 0.72 g per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
3rd week of November sowing timee0
Outcome
dry weight of nodules plant-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.72 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry weight of nodules plant-1 (0.72 g) and leaf area index (4.86) were maximum at 3rd week of November sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third-week November sowing maximized leaf area index at 4.86.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
3rd week of November sowing timee0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.86e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area index (4.86) were maximum at 3rd week of November sowing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑

sowing time · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

sowing time · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 68 positive, 17 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.