Paper · 2015 · International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Influence of vermi-fortification on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth and photosynthetic pigments

Anoop Yadav; V. K. Garg

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different vermicomposts and their dosages on chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) plants in pot culture experiment. A total of five potting media were prepared containing soil and vermicompost. Soil fortified with 10 and 20 % vermicompost was used as potting media. The fertility status of soil and vermicomposts was quantified. In these potting media, growth, yield and biochemical parameters of chickpea plants were studied up to 90 days. The results showed that the fortification of soil with vermicompost significantly stimulated the chickpea plant growth. The plant height, plant shoot biomass, number of pods and photosynthetic pigments were significantly higher in vermicompost-fortified experiments, whereas vermicompost fortification had no significant effect on chickpea seed germination as it was ≈100 % in all experiments. Total chlorophyll content in chickpea leaves was in the range of 0.437–1.07 mg/g. Similarly, carotenoid content was minimum in control and maximum in 20 % vermicompost containing potting media. It was concluded that if soil is fortified with appropriate quantities of vermicompost, the chickpea production per unit area could be enhanced significantly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost significantly increased chickpea height and shoot biomass.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicompost-fortifiede0
Outcome
plant height, plant shoot biomasse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height, plant shoot biomass, number of pods and photosynthetic pigments were significantly higher in vermicompost-fortified experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost significantly increased chickpea pod number.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicompost-fortifiede0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height, plant shoot biomass, number of pods and photosynthetic pigments were significantly higher in vermicompost-fortified experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost significantly increased chickpea photosynthetic pigments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
vermicompost-fortifiede0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height, plant shoot biomass, number of pods and photosynthetic pigments were significantly higher in vermicompost-fortified experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost had no significant effect on chickpea seed germination, which was approximately 100% in all experiments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
vermicompost fortificatione0
Outcome
chickpea seed germinatione0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Value
≈100 %e0
Comparator
all experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vermicompost fortification had no significant effect on chickpea seed germination as it was ≈100 % in all experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–882 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea leaf chlorophyll content ranged from 0.437 to 1.07 mg/g.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
Total chlorophyll contente0
Value
0.437–1.07 mg/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total chlorophyll content in chickpea leaves was in the range of 0.437–1.07 mg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoids were lowest in control and highest in 20% vermicompost medium.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
20 % vermicompost containing potting mediae0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carotenoid content was minimum in control and maximum in 20 % vermicompost containing potting media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.