Paper · 2019 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Synergistic effect of bio-inoculants on yield, nodulation and nutrient uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL) under rainfed conditions

Vivek Sharma; Sandeep Sharma; Sapana Sharma; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The use of efficient bio-inoculants in chickpea is the best way to increase crop productivity under rainfed conditions. To assess the combined effect of bio-inoculants on crop yield, field experiments were conducted during Rabi seasons at Research Station, Punjab Agricultural University, Ballowal Saunkhri, Punjab, India. The application of different bio-inoculants significantly improved number of pods, grain and straw yield of chickpea over the un-inoculated treatment. The combined application of Rhizobium + PSB + AM fungi + azotobactor inoculums as seed treatment with 75% of recommended phosphorus produced highest grain yield. The nodule count, nodule weight, per cent root colonization of AM fungi and different enzymes activities in soil were also highest in combined bio-inoculants treatment. The present study concluded that combined application of bio-inoculants (Rhizobium, PSB, AM fungi and azotobactor) can save 25% of recommended phosphorus by sustaining the crop yield and improving the soil health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-inoculants significantly increased chickpea pod number and grain and straw yield versus uninoculated plants.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
different bio-inoculantse0
Outcome
number of pods, grain and straw yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
un-inoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of different bio-inoculants significantly improved number of pods, grain and straw yield of chickpea over the un-inoculated treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculants with 75% recommended phosphorus gave the highest grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of Rhizobium + PSB + AM fungi + azotobactor inoculums as seed treatment with 75% of recommended phosphoruse0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
PSB + AM fungi + azotobactore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of Rhizobium + PSB + AM fungi + azotobactor inoculums as seed treatment with 75% of recommended phosphorus produced highest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculants gave the highest nodule count, weight and AM fungal root colonization.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined bio-inoculants treatmente0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
nodule count, nodule weight, per cent root colonization of AM fungie0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nodule count, nodule weight, per cent root colonization of AM fungi and different enzymes activities in soil were also highest in combined bio-inoculants treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil enzyme activities were highest with the combined inoculants.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined bio-inoculants treatmente0
Outcome
enzymes activities in soile0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different enzymes activities in soil were also highest in combined bio-inoculants treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude combined inoculants could save 25% recommended phosphorus while sustaining yield and soil health.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined application of bio-inoculants (Rhizobium, PSB, AM fungi and azotobactor)e0
Outcome
save 25% of recommended phosphorus by sustaining the crop yield and improving the soil healthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of bio-inoculants (Rhizobium, PSB, AM fungi and azotobactor) can save 25% of recommended phosphorus by sustaining the crop yield and improving the soil health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–89 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.