Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Use of Plant-Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Mycorrhizal Fungi Consortium as a Strategy to Improve Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Productivity under Different Irrigation Regimes

Sara Laranjeira; Sara Reis; Cristina Torcato; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Climate change prediction indicates an increased likelihood of precipitation variability and droughts in the Mediterranean region. Previous studies demonstrated that microbial symbionts combined with supplementary irrigation could mitigate climate change effects and boost chickpea production in low-fertility soils. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of inoculation with a consortium of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) (Pseudomonas sp., Burkholderia sp. and Mesorhizobium sp.) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) (Rhizophagus irregularis, Funneliformis geosporum and Claroideoglomus claroideum) on growth, grain yield and crude protein content of chickpeas under the following irrigation regimes: I1-no water stress, I2-moderate water stress, I3-strong water-stress, I4-no water stress in critical growth stages of plant cycle development and I5-severe water stress). Plants irrigated only during the critical growth stages of flowering and pod filling showed higher grain yields compared to plants from other water deficit irrigation treatments. Additionally, chickpeas co-inoculated with PGPR and AMF, and irrigated only during critical growth stages, presented higher grain yield than non-inoculated plants without water stress (1.45- and 1.33-fold increase in 2018 and 2019, respectively). Inoculation with beneficial microorganisms and supplemental irrigation at critical stages benefits chickpea growth and should be considered for increasing crop productivity and promoting agricultural sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation only during flowering and pod filling yielded more grain than other deficit irrigation treatments.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigated only during the critical growth stages of flowering and pod fillinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other water deficit irrigation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants irrigated only during the critical growth stages of flowering and pod filling showed higher grain yields compared to plants from other water deficit irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation with PGPR and AMF plus critical-stage irrigation yielded 1.45-fold more grain in 2018 than uninoculated unstressed plants.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
co-inoculated with PGPR and AMF, and irrigated only during critical growth stagese0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.45-e0
Qualifier
2018e0
Comparator
non-inoculated plants without water stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“chickpeas co-inoculated with PGPR and AMF, and irrigated only during critical growth stages, presented higher grain yield than non-inoculated plants without water stress (1.45- and 1.33-fold increase in 2018 and 2019, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation with PGPR and AMF plus critical-stage irrigation yielded 1.33-fold more grain in 2019 than uninoculated unstressed plants.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
co-inoculated with PGPR and AMF, and irrigated only during critical growth stagese0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.33-folde0
Qualifier
2019e0
Comparator
non-inoculated plants without water stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“chickpeas co-inoculated with PGPR and AMF, and irrigated only during critical growth stages, presented higher grain yield than non-inoculated plants without water stress (1.45- and 1.33-fold increase in 2018 and 2019, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1320 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend beneficial microorganisms and supplemental irrigation at critical stages to increase chickpea growth and productivity.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Inoculation with beneficial microorganisms and supplemental irrigation at critical stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation with beneficial microorganisms and supplemental irrigation at critical stages benefits chickpea growth and should be considered for increasing crop productivity and promoting agricultural sustainability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1536 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 42 positive, 5 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.