Paper · 2017 · Legume Research - An International Journal

The response of some physiological traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)to biochar and phosphorus fertilizer application

Patricia Jozina Macil; John Bob Ochanda Ogola; Jude Julius Owuor Odhiambo; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study assessed the response of photosynthesis, chlorophyll content (CC), stomatal conductance (SC) and intercepted radiation (IR) of chickpea to biochar (0, 5 10 and 20 t ha-1) and phosphorus (P) fertilizer (0 and 90 kg ha-1) rates in Thohoyandou, South Africa in 2013/2014 summer and winter seasons. Photosynthesis, CC, SC and IR were determined at vegetative and reproductive stages. Biochar increased SC and CC by 22 - 49% and 57 – 126%, respectively. P increased CC by up to 9% in the winter sowing. IR increased with P and biochar application in both sowings. Biochar increased plant height only at 70 days after emergence and P increased plant height at all plant growth stages. Biochar and phosphorus did not affect photosynthesis in either season. Therefore the use of biochar and inorganic phosphorus fertilizer may be beneficial in chickpea cropping systems characterised by poor soils and dry winter seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased chickpea stomatal conductance by 22 - 49%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
SCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22 - 49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar increased SC and CC by 22 - 49% and 57 – 126%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“stomatal conductance (SC) and intercepted radiation (IR) of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased chickpea chlorophyll content by 57 – 126%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
CCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
57 – 126%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar increased SC and CC by 22 - 49% and 57 – 126%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–459 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll content (CC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus increased chickpea chlorophyll content by up to 9% in winter sowing.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
CCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 9%e0
Qualifier
winter sowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P increased CC by up to 9% in the winter sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–508 · show in text ↑
e1

“of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus increased intercepted radiation in chickpea in both sowings.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
IRe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both sowingse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IR increased with P and biochar application in both sowings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–569 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercepted radiation (IR) of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased intercepted radiation in chickpea in both sowings.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
IRe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both sowingse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IR increased with P and biochar application in both sowings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–569 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercepted radiation (IR) of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased chickpea plant height only at 70 days after emergence.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only at 70 days after emergencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar increased plant height only at 70 days after emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus increased chickpea plant height at all growth stages.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
all plant growth stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P increased plant height at all plant growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar did not affect chickpea photosynthesis in either season.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
either seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar and phosphorus did not affect photosynthesis in either season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus did not affect chickpea photosynthesis in either season.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
phosphoruse0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
either seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar and phosphorus did not affect photosynthesis in either season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest biochar and inorganic phosphorus fertilizer for chickpea systems with poor soils and dry winters.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
use of biochar and inorganic phosphorus fertilizere0
Qualifier
poor soils and dry winter seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of biochar and inorganic phosphorus fertilizer may be beneficial in chickpea cropping systems characterised by poor soils and dry winter seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–924 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

58 papers: 55 positive, 3 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

biochar · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biochar · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

biochar · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.