Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to see the effect of phosphorus (P) and iron (Fe) on protein content in grain and chlorophyll content in leaf of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Four levels of P with four levels of Fe were applied. Increasing P levels increased protein content in grain upto 23.99% in 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 over control (19.09%). But in chlorophyll content at par higher in 40 (2.50 mg g−1) and 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 (2.52 mg g−1) over control (2.30 mg g−1) and 20 kg P2O5ha−1 (2.38 mg g−1). Application of Fe also increased the protein content with increasing level from 0 to 7.5 kg Fe ha−1. It was lower (23.45%) in control and higher in highest level, which was at par with 5 kg Fe ha−1. In the chlorophyll content maximum increased in 7.5 kg Fe ha−1 over 0, 2.5 and 5 kg Fe ha−1. From the study application of 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 7.5 kg Fe ha−1 were found better application than the rest of the treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing phosphorus raised chickpea grain protein content to 23.99% at 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 from 19.09% in control.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 40 kg P2O5 ha−1e0
- Outcome
- protein content in graine0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 23.99%e0
- Qualifier
- 19.09%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing P levels increased protein content in grain upto 23.99% in 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 over control (19.09%).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea leaf chlorophyll content reached 2.50 mg g−1 at 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 versus control.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 40e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2.50 mg g−1e0
- Qualifier
- 2.30 mg g−1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“But in chlorophyll content at par higher in 40 (2.50 mg g−1) and 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 (2.52 mg g−1) over control (2.30 mg g−1) and 20 kg P2O5ha−1 (2.38 mg g−1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea leaf chlorophyll content reached 2.52 mg g−1 at 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 versus control.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 60 kg P2O5 ha−1e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2.52 mg g−1e0
- Qualifier
- 2.30 mg g−1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“But in chlorophyll content at par higher in 40 (2.50 mg g−1) and 60 kg P2O5 ha−1 (2.52 mg g−1) over control (2.30 mg g−1) and 20 kg P2O5ha−1 (2.38 mg g−1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing iron from 0 to 7.5 kg Fe ha−1 increased chickpea protein content.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 7.5 kg Fe ha−1e0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- 0e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of Fe also increased the protein content with increasing level from 0 to 7.5 kg Fe ha−1.”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea protein content in the iron control was 23.45%.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- controle0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 23.45%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of Fe also increased the protein content with increasing level from 0 to 7.5 kg Fe ha−1. It was lower (23.45%) in control and higher in highest level, which was at par with 5 kg Fe ha−1.”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest iron level raised chlorophyll content above 0, 2.5 and 5 kg Fe ha−1.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 7.5 kg Fe ha−1e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- 0, 2.5 and 5 kg Fe ha−1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the chlorophyll content maximum increased in 7.5 kg Fe ha−1 over 0, 2.5 and 5 kg Fe ha−1.”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors favored 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 7.5 kg Fe ha−1 applications.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)Cicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 7.5 kg Fe ha−1e0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“From the study application of 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 7.5 kg Fe ha−1 were found better application than the rest of the treatment.”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.)”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
iron atom · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →phosphorus · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →phosphorus · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
23 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.