Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same Fe and Zn combination gave higher protein content.

A claim from Influence of iron and zinc on yield, quality of chickpea and status of iron and zinc in post harvest soil · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same Fe and Zn combination gave higher protein content.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RPP + 6 kg Fe ha-1 + 4 kg Zn ha-1e4
Outcome
protein contente4
Direction
highere4
Setting
vertisols of the Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Vijayapure0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of iron and zinc on yield, quality of chickpea and status of iron and zinc in post harvest soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105
e0

“A field experiment to study the effect of iron and zinc nutrition on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by chickpea conducted in the vertisols of the Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Vijayapur during rabi 2017-18.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–509
e4

“higher protein content, uptake of nutrients (Fe and Zn) by the crop and residual iron and zinc status in soil were recorded due to the application of RPP + 6 kg Fe ha-1 + 4 kg Zn ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1420

Title

Influence of iron and zinc on yield, quality of chickpea and status of iron and zinc in post harvest soil

C. Pooja; I. M. Sarawad Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal 2019. doi:10.18805/ag.d-4882

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-697f3052d3f7502c08f305f65aa0cb2e313484ad388b4cbac13c12b74d2fa4e9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.