Abstract
To determine the effects of drought stress and Zinc fertilizer on yield, yield components and grain protein profiling pattern of chickpea a field experiment was conducted on a clay soil, in Bu-Ali Sina University of Hamedan, Iran. The experiment was a split- factorial design with three replications. The main treatment was drought stress (sever drought stress, moderate drought stress and no drought stress). The sub treatment was four cultivars of chickpea, Azad, Bivanij, Hashem and ILC482 and 2 Zn levels (using hand sprayer 1 L and control). The results showen that the effects of drought stress on yield and yield components, effect of cultivars on grain yield and protein yield were significant. With increasing level of drought stress yield, yield components and protein yield decreased. Therefore, Bivanij cultivar had highest production of chickpea (grain yield and grain protein yield) and Hashem cultivar had a lowest among of them. Application of Zinc fertilizer had better effect on grain yield, yield components and grain protein yield compared to the control and grain yield and biomass yield increased with application of it significantly. Therefore, we can increase yield and grain protein yield of chickpea by irrigation and application of Zinc fertilizer. Also the results revealed that drought stress and Zn fertilizer had not effects on grain protein banding patterns in chickpea cultivars.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Yield decreased with increasing drought stress.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“With increasing level of drought stress yield, yield components and protein yield decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield components decreased with increasing drought stress.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“With increasing level of drought stress yield, yield components and protein yield decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein yield decreased with increasing drought stress.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“With increasing level of drought stress yield, yield components and protein yield decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
Bivanij had the highest grain and grain protein yields among cultivars.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Material
- Bivanij cultivare0
- Outcome
- grain yield and grain protein yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bivanij cultivar had highest production of chickpea (grain yield and grain protein yield)”
Claim · model-written summary
Hashem had the lowest production among cultivars.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Hashem cultivar had a lowest among of them”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc fertilizer significantly increased grain yield compared with control.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Application of Zinc fertilizer had better effect on grain yield, yield components and grain protein yield compared to the control and grain yield and biomass yield increased with application of it significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc fertilizer significantly increased biomass yield.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Application of Zinc fertilizer had better effect on grain yield, yield components and grain protein yield compared to the control and grain yield and biomass yield increased with application of it significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc fertilizer improved yield components and grain protein yield compared with control.
- Treatment
- Zinc fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yield components and grain protein yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Application of Zinc fertilizer had better effect on grain yield, yield components and grain protein yield compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought stress did not change grain protein banding patterns.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- drought stresse0
- Outcome
- grain protein banding patternse0
- Direction
- had not effectse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“drought stress and Zn fertilizer had not effects on grain protein banding patterns in chickpea cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc fertilizer did not change grain protein banding patterns.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Zn fertilizere0
- Outcome
- grain protein banding patternse0
- Direction
- had not effectse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“drought stress and Zn fertilizer had not effects on grain protein banding patterns in chickpea cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →zinc atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
67 papers more in this group
See all 71 papers →drought · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.