Abstract
A field experiment was performed in order to evaluate the effects of irrigation and application of K fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, ILC-482 cultivar. Experiment was performed in factorial using randomized complete block design with three replications. In this experiment, two factor consist of irrigation in three levels (I1= non irrigation and I2= irrigation in flowering stage), K fertilizer in six levels (K1=0, K2=25kg/ha, K3=50kg/ha, K4=75kg/ha, K5=100kg/ha and K6=125kg/ha) was studied. The results showed that the effect of irrigation on seed storage proteins and protein yield was significant. Also results showed that effect of K fertilizer on seed storage proteins and protein yield was not significant. In non irrigation treatment seed storage proteins was increased compared to irrigation treatment and protein yield decreased. Also, results showed that no effects treatments (irrigation and K fertilizer) on protein banding patterns. Also, results indicated that not obvious any new band and not deleted any bands in all treatments
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at flowering had a significant effect on chickpea seed storage proteins and protein yield.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Material
- ILC-482e1
- Treatment
- irrigation in flowering stagee2
- Outcome
- seed storage proteins and protein yielde3
- Comparator
- non irrigatione2
- Setting
- fielde1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was performed in order to evaluate the effects of irrigation and application of K fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, ILC-482 cultivar”
e2“non irrigation and I2= irrigation in flowering stage”
e3“The results showed that the effect of irrigation on seed storage proteins and protein yield was significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Non-irrigated chickpea had increased seed storage proteins compared with irrigated plants.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- non irrigatione2
- Outcome
- seed storage proteinse2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Comparator
- irrigation treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was performed in order to evaluate the effects of irrigation and application of K fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, ILC-482 cultivar”
e2“In non irrigation treatment seed storage proteins was increased compared to irrigation treatment and protein yield decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
Non-irrigated chickpea had decreased protein yield compared with irrigated plants.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- non irrigatione2
- Outcome
- protein yielde2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Comparator
- irrigation treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was performed in order to evaluate the effects of irrigation and application of K fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, ILC-482 cultivar”
e2“In non irrigation treatment seed storage proteins was increased compared to irrigation treatment and protein yield decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
K fertilizer had no significant effect on chickpea seed storage proteins and protein yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- K fertilizere3
- Outcome
- seed storage proteins and protein yielde3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was performed in order to evaluate the effects of irrigation and application of K fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, ILC-482 cultivar”
e3“effect of K fertilizer on seed storage proteins and protein yield was not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation and K fertilizer had no effect on chickpea protein banding patterns, with no new or deleted bands.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- irrigation and K fertilizere4
- Outcome
- protein banding patternse4
- Qualifier
- not obvious any new band and not deleted any bandse5
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was performed in order to evaluate the effects of irrigation and application of K fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, ILC-482 cultivar”
e4“no effects treatments (irrigation and K fertilizer) on protein banding patterns”
e5“not obvious any new band and not deleted any bands in all treatments”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →potassium · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.