Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research

Effect of Irrigation and Application of Zn Fertilizer on Seed Storage Proteins of Chickpea (Cice Arietinum L.)

Morad Shaban

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was performed in order to evaluate the effects of irrigation and application of Zn fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, Azad cultivar. Experiment was performed in an factorial using randomized complete block design with three replications. In this experiment, two factor consist of irrigation in three levels (I1= non irrigation and I2= irrigation in flowering stage), Zn fertilizer in six levels (Zn1=0, Zn2=15kg/ha, Zn3=25kg/ha, Zn4=35kg/ha, Zn5=55kg/ha and Zn6=65kg/ha ) was studied. The results showed that the effect of irrigation on seed storage proteins and protein yield was significant (P<0.01). Also results showed that effect of Zn fertilizer on seed storage proteins and protein yield was not significant. In non irrigation treatment seed storage proteins was increased compared to irrigation treatment and protein yield decreased. Also, results showed that no effects treatments (irrigation and Zn fertilizer) on protein banding patterns. Also, results indicated that not obvious any new band and not deleted any bands in all treatments

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation had a significant effect on seed storage proteins and protein yield

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Azade0
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
seed storage proteins and protein yielde1
Value
P<0.01e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of irrigation and application of Zn fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, Azad cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–156 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the effect of irrigation on seed storage proteins and protein yield was significant (P<0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilizer had no significant effect on seed storage proteins and protein yield

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Azade0
Treatment
Zn fertilizere2
Outcome
seed storage proteins and protein yielde2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of irrigation and application of Zn fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, Azad cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–156 · show in text ↑
e2

“Also results showed that effect of Zn fertilizer on seed storage proteins and protein yield was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-irrigated chickpea had increased seed storage proteins compared with irrigated

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Azade0
Treatment
non irrigatione3
Outcome
seed storage proteinse3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
irrigation treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of irrigation and application of Zn fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, Azad cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–156 · show in text ↑
e3

“In non irrigation treatment seed storage proteins was increased compared to irrigation treatment and protein yield decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-irrigated chickpea had decreased protein yield compared with irrigated

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Azade0
Treatment
non irrigatione3
Outcome
protein yielde3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
irrigation treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of irrigation and application of Zn fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, Azad cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–156 · show in text ↑
e3

“In non irrigation treatment seed storage proteins was increased compared to irrigation treatment and protein yield decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and Zinc fertilizer had no effect on protein banding patterns of chickpea

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Azade0
Treatment
irrigation and Zn fertilizere4
Outcome
protein banding patternse4
Direction
no effectse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of irrigation and application of Zn fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, Azad cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–156 · show in text ↑
e4

“Also, results showed that no effects treatments (irrigation and Zn fertilizer) on protein banding patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–973 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No new protein band appeared and no band was lost in any treatment of chickpea

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Azade0
Outcome
new bande5
Qualifier
not deleted any bands in all treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of irrigation and application of Zn fertilizer on seed storage proteins in chickpea, Azad cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–156 · show in text ↑
e5

“Also, results indicated that not obvious any new band and not deleted any bands in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1072 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 48 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.