Abstract
The study was carried out at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Lam for three years (2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23) for assessing the productivity of chickpea using foliar nutrition under rainfed conditions of the Krishna Agro Climatic Zone of South Coastal Andhra Pradesh. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design and was replicated thrice. The experiment consisting of eight treatments viz., control (RDF:N20:P50:K0 kg ha -1), application of water soluble NPK, Zn, Fe, soluble monophosphate and soluble potassium nitrate at different stages alone and in combinations. Pooled analysis (2020-2023) of the experimental results revealed that along with recommended dose of fertilizers (N20:P50:K0 kg ha-1) foliar application of Zn @ 0.2% at pre flowering, water soluble monophosphate @1% at flowering and water soluble potassium nitrate @1% at pod filling stage recorded significantly higher seed yield (1871 kg ha-1) and protein content (22.90%) which was on par with foliar application of Fe @ 0.5% at pre flowering, monophosphate@1% at flowering and potassium nitrate @ 1% at pod filling stage with seed yield (1821 kg ha -1) and (22.63%) protein content, both the treatments recorded BCR of 1.9.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Zn, monophosphate and potassium nitrate sprays significantly increased chickpea seed yield over recommended fertilizer alone.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application of Zn @ 0.2% at pre flowering, water soluble monophosphate @1% at flowering and water soluble potassium nitrate @1% at pod filling stagee0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Value
- 1871 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- recommended dose of fertilizerse1
- Setting
- rainfed conditionse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“THE PRODUCTIVITY OF CHICKPEA”
e0“foliar application of Zn @ 0.2% at pre flowering, water soluble monophosphate @1% at flowering and water soluble potassium nitrate @1% at pod filling stage recorded significantly higher seed yield (1871 kg ha-1) and protein content (22.90%)”
e1“along with recommended dose of fertilizers (N20:P50:K0 kg ha-1)”
e2“under rainfed conditions of the Krishna Agro Climatic Zone”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar nutrient sprays significantly increased chickpea protein content to 22.90%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of Zn @ 0.2% at pre flowering, water soluble monophosphate @1% at flowering and water soluble potassium nitrate @1% at pod filling stagee0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Value
- 22.90%e0
- Comparator
- recommended dose of fertilizerse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“THE PRODUCTIVITY OF CHICKPEA”
e0“foliar application of Zn @ 0.2% at pre flowering, water soluble monophosphate @1% at flowering and water soluble potassium nitrate @1% at pod filling stage recorded significantly higher seed yield (1871 kg ha-1) and protein content (22.90%)”
e1“along with recommended dose of fertilizers (N20:P50:K0 kg ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Fe, monophosphate and potassium nitrate sprays gave chickpea seed yield on par with the Zn combination.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of Fe @ 0.5% at pre flowering, monophosphate@1% at flowering and potassium nitrate @ 1% at pod filling stagee3
- Outcome
- seed yielde3
- Direction
- on pare3
- Value
- 1821 kg ha -1e3
- Comparator
- foliar application of Zn @ 0.2% at pre floweringe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“THE PRODUCTIVITY OF CHICKPEA”
e0“foliar application of Zn @ 0.2% at pre flowering”
e3“which was on par with foliar application of Fe @ 0.5% at pre flowering, monophosphate@1% at flowering and potassium nitrate @ 1% at pod filling stage with seed yield (1821 kg ha -1) and (22.63%) protein content”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Fe, monophosphate and potassium nitrate sprays gave chickpea protein content on par with the Zn combination.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of Fe @ 0.5% at pre flowering, monophosphate@1% at flowering and potassium nitrate @ 1% at pod filling stagee3
- Outcome
- protein contente3
- Direction
- on pare3
- Value
- 22.63%e3
- Comparator
- foliar application of Zn @ 0.2% at pre floweringe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“THE PRODUCTIVITY OF CHICKPEA”
e0“foliar application of Zn @ 0.2% at pre flowering”
e3“which was on par with foliar application of Fe @ 0.5% at pre flowering, monophosphate@1% at flowering and potassium nitrate @ 1% at pod filling stage with seed yield (1821 kg ha -1) and (22.63%) protein content”
Claim · model-written summary
Both the best foliar nutrient treatments recorded a benefit-cost ratio of 1.9.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- BCRe4
- Value
- 1.9e4
- Qualifier
- both the treatmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“THE PRODUCTIVITY OF CHICKPEA”
e4“both the treatments recorded BCR of 1.9”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →zinc atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
67 papers more in this group
See all 71 papers →iron atom · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
iron atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 23 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →potassium nitrate · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
potassium nitrate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →application · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.