Abstract
A field experiment was conducted on clayey soil during Rabi season of 2011-12 to 2013-2014 to study effects of foliar application of organic and inorganic substances on the yield of chick pea (GJG-3) under limited water supply at Main Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia. The experiment comprising of 2 main plot (2 levels of irrigation) and seven sub plot treatments (spraying of organic and inorganic substances) laid out in split plot design with three replications. Effect of foliar application of organic and inorganic substances treatments on root length, plant height, number of branches/plant, and mature pods/plant at 75 DAS and maturity were significantly improved under two irrigation (one irrigation at flowering and second at pod development stage (I2). The stem growth rate, leaf growth rate, pod growth rate and crop growth rate were significantly affected due to combined effect of irrigation and foliar sprays but root growth rate and partitioning percentage were non-significant. The significantly higher yields (pod, seed, straw, biological), shelling %, 100 pod weight, and 100 seed weight of gram were obtained due to foliar spraying of T1 (KNO3 @ 2%), T2 (Urea @ 2%) and T5 (Cow urine 100 ml/l) as compared to control. While, yields (pod, seed, straw and biological), harvest index, shelling %, 100 pod weight, 100 seed weight of gram were not significantly affected due to combined effect of irrigation and foliar spray during all the years of experimentation as well as in pooled results. While seed index was significantly affected due to foliar spray in the year 2012. On the basis of pooled result the data indicated that two irrigation (one irrigation at flowering and second at pod development stage I2) gave the highest gross income (Rs.57904/ha) and net return (Rs.39213/ha). Foliar application with KNO3 @ 2% at flowering and pod development stages found better in respect of gross income (Rs.59285/ha), net return (Rs.39634/ha) and B:C ratio 3.02.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations significantly improved root length, height, branches and mature pods.
- Taxon
- chick pea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Organ / stage
- 75 DAS and maturitye0
- Treatment
- two irrigatione0
- Outcome
- root length, plant height, number of branches/plant, and mature pods/plante0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root length, plant height, number of branches/plant, and mature pods/plant at 75 DAS and maturity were significantly improved under two irrigation (one irrigation at flowering and second at pod development stage (I2).”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined irrigation and foliar sprays significantly affected stem, leaf, pod and crop growth rates.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation and foliar sprayse0
- Outcome
- stem growth rate, leaf growth rate, pod growth rate and crop growth ratee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The stem growth rate, leaf growth rate, pod growth rate and crop growth rate were significantly affected due to combined effect of irrigation and foliar sprays”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined irrigation and foliar sprays did not significantly affect root growth rate or partitioning percentage.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation and foliar sprayse1
- Outcome
- root growth rate and partitioning percentagee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root growth rate and partitioning percentage were non-significant”
t0“Chick Pea”
e1“combined effect of irrigation and foliar sprays”
Claim · model-written summary
KNO3 foliar spray increased yield and related yield traits relative to control.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- KNO3 @ 2%e0
- Outcome
- yields (pod, seed, straw, biological), shelling %, 100 pod weight, and 100 seed weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher yields (pod, seed, straw, biological), shelling %, 100 pod weight, and 100 seed weight of gram were obtained due to foliar spraying of T1 (KNO3 @ 2%), T2 (Urea @ 2%) and T5 (Cow urine 100 ml/l) as compared to control”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea foliar spray increased yield and related yield traits relative to control.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Urea @ 2%e0
- Outcome
- yields (pod, seed, straw, biological), shelling %, 100 pod weight, and 100 seed weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher yields (pod, seed, straw, biological), shelling %, 100 pod weight, and 100 seed weight of gram were obtained due to foliar spraying of T1 (KNO3 @ 2%), T2 (Urea @ 2%) and T5 (Cow urine 100 ml/l) as compared to control”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow urine foliar spray increased yield and related yield traits relative to control.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Cow urine 100 ml/le0
- Outcome
- yields (pod, seed, straw, biological), shelling %, 100 pod weight, and 100 seed weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher yields (pod, seed, straw, biological), shelling %, 100 pod weight, and 100 seed weight of gram were obtained due to foliar spraying of T1 (KNO3 @ 2%), T2 (Urea @ 2%) and T5 (Cow urine 100 ml/l) as compared to control”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined irrigation and foliar spray did not significantly affect yield and related traits.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- combined effect of irrigation and foliar spraye0
- Outcome
- yields (pod, seed, straw and biological), harvest index, shelling %, 100 pod weight, 100 seed weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yields (pod, seed, straw and biological), harvest index, shelling %, 100 pod weight, 100 seed weight of gram were not significantly affected due to combined effect of irrigation and foliar spray during all the years of experimentation as well as in pooled results”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spraying significantly affected seed index in 2012.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- foliar spraye0
- Outcome
- seed indexe0
- Qualifier
- in the year 2012e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed index was significantly affected due to foliar spray in the year 2012”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations gave the highest gross income of Rs.57904/ha.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- two irrigation (one irrigation at flowering and second at pod development stage I2)e0
- Outcome
- gross incomee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- Rs.57904/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two irrigation (one irrigation at flowering and second at pod development stage I2) gave the highest gross income (Rs.57904/ha) and net return (Rs.39213/ha)”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations gave net return of Rs.39213/ha.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- two irrigation (one irrigation at flowering and second at pod development stage I2)e0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- Rs.39213/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two irrigation (one irrigation at flowering and second at pod development stage I2) gave the highest gross income (Rs.57904/ha) and net return (Rs.39213/ha)”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
KNO3 foliar application gave gross income of Rs.59285/ha.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- KNO3 @ 2% at flowering and pod development stagese0
- Outcome
- gross incomee0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- Rs.59285/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with KNO3 @ 2% at flowering and pod development stages found better in respect of gross income (Rs.59285/ha), net return (Rs.39634/ha) and B:C ratio 3.02”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
KNO3 foliar application gave net return of Rs.39634/ha.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- KNO3 @ 2% at flowering and pod development stagese0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- Rs.39634/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with KNO3 @ 2% at flowering and pod development stages found better in respect of gross income (Rs.59285/ha), net return (Rs.39634/ha) and B:C ratio 3.02”
t0“Chick Pea”
Claim · model-written summary
KNO3 foliar application gave a benefit-cost ratio of 3.02.
- Taxon
- chick peaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- KNO3 @ 2% at flowering and pod development stagese0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 3.02e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application with KNO3 @ 2% at flowering and pod development stages found better in respect of gross income (Rs.59285/ha), net return (Rs.39634/ha) and B:C ratio 3.02”
t0“Chick Pea”
The same questions in other papers
potassium nitrate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →irrigation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →application · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 173 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
173 papers more in this group
See all 177 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.