Claim · model-written summary
One initial application of SID or SIDP was as effective as FeEDDHA in preventing iron chlorosis in chickpea over five successive crops
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- one initial application of ∼0.7 g Fe kg⁻¹ soil in the form of SID or SIDPe2
- Outcome
- Fe chlorosise2
- Direction
- as effective ase2
- Comparator
- FeEDDHAe2
- Setting
- pot experiment with five successive cropse2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“showed nanosiderite to prevent iron chlorosis in chickpea”
e2“In a pot experiment with five successive crops, one initial application of ∼0.7 g Fe kg⁻¹ soil in the form of SID or SIDP was as effective as FeEDDHA in preventing Fe chlorosis”
Title
Pot evaluation of synthetic nanosiderite for the prevention of iron chlorosis
Inmaculada Sánchez‐Alcalá; María C del Campillo; Vidal Barrón; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2012. doi:10.1002/jsfa.5569
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Nanosiderite suspensions applied to calcareous soil prevented iron chlorosis in chickpea
- Intervention effect The residual effect of nanosiderite applied to the first crop alone exceeded that of FeEDDHA in chickpea
- Observation Experimental oxidation of SID yielded goethite
- Observation Experimental oxidation of SIDP yielded a mixture of lepidocrocite and goethite
- Observation The average specific surface area of SID was ∼140 m² g⁻¹
- Observation The average specific surface area of SIDP was ∼220 m² g⁻¹