Claim · model-written summary
VAM fungi other than Glomus mosseae did not significantly affect chickpea nitrogenase activity.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- VAM fungie0
- Outcome
- nitrogenase activitye0
- Qualifier
- except Glomus mosseaee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“None of the VAM fungi affected the nodule number, nodule dry weight and nitrogenase activity significantly during any of the crop seasons except Glomus mosseae which increased the nitrogenase activity.”
t0“chickpea”
Title
Kumar Rakesh; B.L. Jalali; Hari Chand Legume Research - An International Journal 2004
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect VAM fungi did not significantly affect chickpea nodule number or dry weight in either season.
- Intervention effect Glomus mosseae increased chickpea nitrogenase activity.
- Intervention effect VAM fungal inoculation significantly reduced chickpea rhizosphere fungal population.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased chickpea rhizosphere bacterial and Azotobacter populations.
- Intervention effect Mycorrhizal fungal inoculation generally had no effect on chickpea rhizosphere actinomycetes population.
- Intervention effect Glomus mosseae increased chickpea rhizosphere actinomycetes population in 1995–1996.
- Intervention effect G. fasciculatum increased chickpea rhizosphere actinomycetes population in 1996–1997.
- Intervention effect G. constrietum increased chickpea rhizosphere actinomycetes population in 1996–1997.