Paper · 1995 · Plant Disease

Induced Resistance Against Fusarium Wilt of Chickpea by Nonpathogenic Races ofFusarium oxysporumf. sp.cicerisand Nonpathogenic Isolates ofF oxysporum

A. Hervas

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Germinated seeds of chickpea cultivars JG 62 and ICCV 4 were inoculated with a conidial suspension of nonpathogenic races 0 and 1 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris or isolates of F. oxysporum (inducers), then challenged by root dip in a conidial suspension of F. o. f. sp. ciceris race 5. Prior inoculation with the inducers significantly reduced disease incidence and severity caused by race 5. However, the extent of protection decreased when the inoculum concentration of the challenger was close to that of the inducing agent, and it varied with the nature of inducing agent and genotype of the host. Also, resistance induced by race 0 in JG 62 was annulled when more than 3 days elapsed between inoculations with the nonpathogen and the challenger.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior inoculation with nonpathogenic Fusarium significantly reduced wilt incidence from race 5.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Prior inoculation with the inducerse0
Interactor
F. o. f. sp. ciceris race 5e0pathogen
Second interactor
nonpathogenic races 0 and 1 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cicerise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germinated seeds of chickpea cultivars JG 62 and ICCV 4 were inoculated with a conidial suspension of nonpathogenic races 0 and 1 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris or isolates of F. oxysporum (inducers), then challenged by root dip in a conidial suspension of F. o. f. sp. ciceris race 5. Prior inoculation with the inducers significantly reduced disease incidence and severity caused by race 5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior inoculation with nonpathogenic Fusarium significantly reduced wilt severity from race 5.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Prior inoculation with the inducerse0
Interactor
F. o. f. sp. ciceris race 5e0pathogen
Second interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · Second interactorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germinated seeds of chickpea cultivars JG 62 and ICCV 4 were inoculated with a conidial suspension of nonpathogenic races 0 and 1 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris or isolates of F. oxysporum (inducers), then challenged by root dip in a conidial suspension of F. o. f. sp. ciceris race 5. Prior inoculation with the inducers significantly reduced disease incidence and severity caused by race 5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–398 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protection decreased when challenger inoculum concentration approached inducer concentration.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inducing agente0
Outcome
extent of protectione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
inoculum concentration of the challenger was close to that of the inducing agente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the extent of protection decreased when the inoculum concentration of the challenger was close to that of the inducing agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protection varied with inducing agent and chickpea genotype.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
genotype of the hoste0
Treatment
inducing agente0
Outcome
it variede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it varied with the nature of inducing agent and genotype of the host”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Race 0 induced resistance in JG 62 was lost when more than 3 days separated inoculations.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
JG 62e0
Treatment
race 0e0
Outcome
resistance induced by race 0 in JG 62e0
Direction
annullede0
Qualifier
more than 3 days elapsed between inoculationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resistance induced by race 0 in JG 62 was annulled when more than 3 days elapsed between inoculations with the nonpathogen and the challenger.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–52 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.