Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium alone and dual inoculation did not differ significantly for nodule number and weight.

A claim from Changes in root and nutrient uptake of chickpea affected by organic fertilizers and inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium alone and dual inoculation did not differ significantly for nodule number and weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
single inoculation of Rhizobiume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodule number, nodule weighte0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
dual inoculation of mycorrhiza and Rhizobiume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between the effect of single inoculation of Rhizobium and dual inoculation of mycorrhiza and Rhizobium on nodule number, nodule weight, leaf N and N uptake of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1546

Title

Changes in root and nutrient uptake of chickpea affected by organic fertilizers and inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium

Babak Malekian; Mehdi Parsa; Mohammad Hassan Fallah; et al. Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management 2024. doi:10.1002/cft2.20297

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-d2e17c0e7f93d43fd9c5f3b3b22119ad0537a223640f2bed2f241483970a0bea · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 110 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.