Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CPS-2, CPS-3 and Ca-18 gave the maximum positive effects on chickpea shoot and nodulation traits.

A claim from Phosphorus uptake and growth promotion of chickpea by co-inoculation of mineral phosphate solubilising bacteria and a mixed rhizobial culture · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPS-2, CPS-3 and Ca-18 gave the maximum positive effects on chickpea shoot and nodulation traits.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Phosphate solubilising bacterial strains CPS-2, CPS-3 and Ca-18e0
Interactor
Phosphate solubilising bacterial strains CPS-2, CPS-3 and Ca-18e0symbiont
Outcome
shoot length, shoot dry weight and nodulatione0
Direction
maximum positivee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate solubilising bacterial strains CPS-2, CPS-3 and Ca-18 had the maximum positive effect on shoot length, shoot dry weight and nodulation of chickpea plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1008

Title

Phosphorus uptake and growth promotion of chickpea by co-inoculation of mineral phosphate solubilising bacteria and a mixed rhizobial culture

M. Gull; F. Y. Hafeez; M. Saleem; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2004. doi:10.1071/ea02218

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-aa481b5e34f10000dc6d659cfeb3f896cf0d624244d4191dc583e2427b9beecc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

51 papers: 50 positive, 1 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.