Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rn1 plus Enterobacter B gave maximum nodulation increase in NIFA 88 compared with controls.

A claim from Coinoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium isolates from roots and nodules and phytohormone-producing Enterobacter strains · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rn1 plus Enterobacter B gave maximum nodulation increase in NIFA 88 compared with controls.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
NIFA 88e0
Treatment
coinoculation of Rhizobium strain Rn1 with Enterobacter strain Be0
Interactor
Rhizobium strain Rn1e0symbiont
Second interactor
Enterobacter strain Be0symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
maximum increasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In cultivar NIFA 88, coinoculation of Rhizobium strain Rn1 with Enterobacter strain B resulted in maximum increase in plant biomass and nodulation, as compared with the control treatment (non-inoculated as well as inoculated with Rhizobium strain Rn1 only)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1644
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–183

Title

Coinoculation of chickpea with Rhizobium isolates from roots and nodules and phytohormone-producing Enterobacter strains

Babur Saeed Mirza; M. Sajjad Mirza; Asghari Bano; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2007. doi:10.1071/ea06151

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e1da475a5195c155ed72f379c43577c429d7754a5693d3fc74a8b53c20ca86f9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Enterobacter · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.